Recent content by AlxTMX

  1. AlxTMX

    "re-clocking" the Ultra digital out ?

    Oh, no! After my "anecdote" about life and death was deemed "screed and completely irrelevant', although the analogy there is quite transparent to me, no more personal data here for the vultures to mock. Such a disrespectful level of discussion does not suit me. Sorry, but go on without me now...
  2. AlxTMX

    "re-clocking" the Ultra digital out ?

    I'm not trying to convince anyone or sell anything to anyone. I'm just talking about my experience, which simply happens to be. On the contrary, here one is trying to prove to me that "this can't be because it can never be". Okay, believe it or check it out. But it's pretty stupid to tell me...
  3. AlxTMX

    "re-clocking" the Ultra digital out ?

    Yeah guys, small offtopic. Two years ago I was hospitalized. I felt so bad that death itself didn't seem like such a bad option. The doctors did their tests and analyses and said that, based on objective indicators, I was quite ready to fly into space. But I was just dying! Then it turned out...
  4. AlxTMX

    "re-clocking" the Ultra digital out ?

    The very same to You. The only difference You dream You're objective and I know I'm subjective. And I bet you've never done blind testing (moreover in this particular setup). You're only have a read about it inn your Sacred Books. So i'm not sure which one of us needs the colored pills LOLROFL
  5. AlxTMX

    "re-clocking" the Ultra digital out ?

    A reclocker is not required to have a clock frequency at the input, but such an option undoubtedly improves the quality of its work. All it must do is to produce a stable clock frequency output and a signal tied to it. How exactly it does this is a matter of a specific decision.
  6. AlxTMX

    "re-clocking" the Ultra digital out ?

    And You did? Bet You're not ;) Your theory against my practice. It's so funny :))) So, OK, I've did it A LOT. If i here the difference, I say that I'm here it. Is I'm not, than I say that I'm not. Personally I never say that there is the difference or there it's not. Only that I'm here it or...
  7. AlxTMX

    "re-clocking" the Ultra digital out ?

    There are some price-comparable (x2 or x3 pricier to be honest) solutions for USB reclocking from iFi and I have tried them all but PO100 Pro is simply better in my system. But I don't know if it's better for everyone. So the only hint I cold give is "Have a try".
  8. AlxTMX

    "re-clocking" the Ultra digital out ?

    I'm use SMSL PO100 Pro as a reclocker for my WiiM Ultra for a last few month and improvements are significant. I do prefer Optical over Coaxial or I²S for its galvanic isolation but here the differences are quiet negligible if it's not a self-hipnosis for me. Note the rest of my system is at the...
  9. AlxTMX

    Ongoing Beta Beta Test: Precision Room Correction with FDW (Frequency-Dependent Windowing)

    It's a nice technique to calibrate an audio system for near-field listening, of course. But it's quite strange when the Room Correction system tries to exclude the room influence, which is the influence it should compensate by its name. :) OK, it's useful and provides a tad different result. One...
  10. AlxTMX

    Room correction: very strange Per Channel algorithm and it's respective results

    No, it's not. Completely wrong. But never mind.
  11. AlxTMX

    Room correction: very strange Per Channel algorithm and it's respective results

    Absolutely. It's highly unlikely that anything can be done here without the help of the WiiM team at least that is clearly not interested in it. And as our discussion here has clearly reached a dead end I suggest we forget about it, since we have a workaround, at least.
  12. AlxTMX

    Room correction: very strange Per Channel algorithm and it's respective results

    Hi. There is no any updates on my ticket till now. All digital outputs are struggle of this problem. But there is the workaround for Coaxial an Optical ones (not for USB): to lock output at fixed resolution before Per Channel RC measuring session. Then it could be set back to variable...
  13. AlxTMX

    Room correction: very strange Per Channel algorithm and it's respective results

    Hi! I see the core components of my DAC are very similar to your one and to many other DACs on our planet nowadays: ES9039Pro as DAC chip and XMOS XU316 as controller. So the results are the same obviously. One can use any FIXED resolution for SPDIF as a workaround in Per Channel Room Correction...
Back
Top