Recent content by canard

Wiim, in the future, on its next machines, will certainly be able to improve the buffering of its digital outputs and implement galvanic isolation for the coaxial output (perhaps even on the USB?).... "Doing better"... a normal evolution... (It has improved with their different models) (The...

Post in thread 'The competition doesn't sleep' https://forum.wiimhome.com/threads/the-competition-doesnt-sleep.4479/post-166363 https://forum.wiimhome.com/threads/the-competition-doesnt-sleep.4479/post-166269 seems understandable here But rest assured, I will no longer participate in this...

In practice, this remains the most important page, being the most functional... while the entry screen can be useful, direct access to our favorites would be even more so... (In the same situation as choosing "Wiim" when there's only one machine... the volume bar, if set to a fixed level, is...

I'm taking advantage of this... But would it be possible to remove this information when, as in my case, there's only one machine available? a bit stupid... It's useless information, or even a useless function... and keep this space for useful information or a useful function? In my case, and...

In j-test... in toslink or spdif out .. Don't mix everything up. The observations I pointed out by onlyoneme have nothing to do with what armim is pointing out, for example, here on the mini...nothing at all, etc. like the measurements taken by some, clumsy ones taken on RME... despite the...

"""Let's talk about the jitter over digital outputs. I will use the Holo Audio Spring 3 DAC which is a true NOS DAC and has an unique ability to turn off its PLL. This way I can compare a raw performance of the outputs in j-test.""" Thread of onlyoneme This is not done in the Armim measures...

So, try to understand onlyoneme's message and results...and possibly understand precisely how the method differs here from what armim presents on asr here... the useful thing... ;-) No problemo for me ;-) https://forum.wiimhome.com/threads/the-competition-doesnt-sleep.4479/post-166269

No worries... ;-) Just so you know, the measurements on the Toslink from ASR *"don't show anything" about the Wiim output... I suggest you read onlyoneme's thread above to understand... ;-) * yet quick to point out approaches that are not rigorous, not scientific, biais cognitifs etc., "among...

(The slight intellectual dishonesty is... Starting from the idea that "the subject of jitter no longer exists," to ""demonstrate"" it in this way... when the actual observation of the output signal quality of a source on this type of output should be... no more, and objectively... A...

No pretensions here... especially since the subject is very simple... and logic but to make things clearer... I pointed to onlyoneme's thread (who had the courtesy to try to understand my gibberish at first...) Sorry for "my blabla"... Using the observation method at the DAC output, "which...

I don't mind being taken for a fool... ;-) But what about you? Faced with this pseudo-scientific rigor...? It even tinges with demagoguery... ;-) End for me...

https://forum.wiimhome.com/threads/jitter-over-digital-outputs-for-different-wiims.4186/ Here, onlyoneme has taken the necessary precaution if the idea is to present things in this way.

But the AP allows for relevant measurements of output jiters...but that's completely unrelated... https://www.ap.com/analyzers-accessories/apx-overview/jitter (I'm not talking about you, Dominik... that's not my idea, really.. ) but "Au pays des aveugles, les borgnes sont roi"

A clue... Here, as with similar observations made using an RME card and its steadyclock... So... everything's fine... ;-) All these observations, made in this way, are completely biased... are only possible if no input treatments, or very non efficient, are applied.:cool: Here we only observe...

I respect you very much...but you're mistaken here, and in a way, being misled is wrong.