Recent content by canard

hihi ..exactly confirms my feeling and my "modest analysis" ;-)))) (mini ) pro plus/ ultra and amp pro/amp ultra before moving forward...rationalize, right? ;-)

Indeed, it's just that I'm more driven by what I want for Wiim...and not "for myself" as we keep reading... "They have to do ****" ("I have to") It just seems funny to me to observe the removal of the two products from the carousel, which seems to justify it... I especially want Wiim to "make...

sure...? mini....latest products? ;-) stop for me... not " important" (It just wouldn't seem inconsistent to me to rationalize the streamers' offer...... the same for the "all in one"... wiim "only amp"? like the wiim "only pro"? " pro plus "/ "amp pro" ) ;-) (Pro and amp were, in some ways...

It's not trivial... and I didn't know the word "slideshow" :oops: ;-)

not for me.... in principal presentation... in "image.." in top... "featured" product (anyway there must be some stock left to sell ;-) )

no wiim pro here... only " pro plus" (seem logical issue for the "pro")

The pro seems to have "disappeared" on the Wiim streaming side... there's the Mini, Plus, and Ultra... So it could rationally be revised in the future: The Mini in MK2... and has a Plus/Ultra "2" without a screen and an Ultra "2", same machine, with a screen ;-) 3 price positions may be...

? mini dont have chromecast..you need pro and more... i talk about ethernet via adaptator and old chromecast audio...

https://www.minidsp.com/community/threads/new-autoeq-add-on-license-powered-by-rew.23788/#post-74624

an update of their oldest product...the "mini".... quality audio in/out , chip/ ram etc, possibility of ethernet via power usb socket ( like old chromecast audio)... ? ;-) (a machine that continues to make a lot of sense as long as it remains well placed in terms of price....Basically, it would...

We often point to standardized approaches at 80-81 dB... which is already quite loud... and certainly needs to be adapted to everyday listening habits, it seems to me ;-) Measurements at relatively quiet times are, of course, welcome... while avoiding helicopter or fighter jet overhead ;-)

At a reasonable level, the noise issue isn't really a problem for correction. It's for distortion measurements that it is, and the precautions regarding sweep methodology/measurement depth/level are essential, delicat.... ;-)

It's not normal that you're the one who notices this phase thing...and not check it beforehand...

This is unfortunately known and has not been resolved since the very existence of the peq mode...so a long time...

look at the space available in a plus an ultra etc..and your chip treatments etc in cms... These are efforts that could be made quite simply in rereading their main streamers probably ;-)