You’re confusing ‘mains-borne noise’ with ground loops. Not the same thing. I’ve had my Ultra cranked up to full, my power amp up to full, and my ear to the speaker (with no music playing) and it’s silent.
You have a ground loop, which you’ve both identified and fixed with a long extension...
The simple answer to your question is that a sub will almost certainly be the better purchase for you, and by a country mile. It's not even close; I'm presuming here that your only issue is general sound quality, not the extra connections and features, or the amount of power available.
Any...
I think you can pick up a cheap, transparent DAC with optical in for sub-£80; the SMSL PS200 is £76 at Amazon UK, the SMSL SU-1 is only £63.
Your initial problem has ground loop written all over it, and using a DAC with optical in as a bridge to eliminate this is a tried and tested method, with...
"Rumored but unannounced.." yes, but mentioned by WiiM to a journalist at a hi-fi show recently.
I'd be a bit more sceptical if it were something they hoped to make and release, but which might prove un-doable, but I think WiiM probably shouldn't have too much trouble not including the screen...
A question on the Sub Pro.
I've seen that it can be paired with any WiiM streamer.
Is that correct, and if so,, do you get all the flexibility?
Example - if I pair a Sub Pro with a WiiM Mini, do I get all the crossover, phase, etc. settings as with the Ultra?
What do you mean by 'music on your phone'?
If you mean the streaming services on your phone, they have the wi-fi input.
If you're talking about music stored on your phone, sent to your WiiM, then that's the Bluetooth input.
🤷♂️
Forgive me, I've not used these in a while.
But I return to...
Because it’s a source of music, and should be treated like the other sources of music.
I want to listen to a record. Then I want to listen to a CD. Then I want to listen to something streamed. Then I want to listen to something on my USB stick. They’re just different sources of music, and...
Science questions itself, yes.
But when it’s had research, duplicated and peer reviewed, repeatedly, it accepts those results as the current state of play until further research shows it to be erroneous.
That’s quite different to what you’re proposing, which is to believing something at odds...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.