Feature Request Voting (Downvotes)

Wiimer

Major Contributor
Joined
Oct 28, 2022
Messages
3,392
Location
Japan
@RyanWithWiim,
To me the voting system in this forum seems pointless. What is the value of anonymous voting? 🤔

Edit: Fixed due to thread move.
 
Last edited:
Here the WiiM team makes an interesting statement.

They do not mention search history, but if this happens your request may be fulfilled.😄


@RyanWithWiim,
To me the voting system in this forum seems pointless. What is the value of anonymous voting? 🤔
I believe we can make it so people have to be logged in to vote. Do you think that'd have more value? In general, we try to consider higher voted ideas first, but it's a little tricky with so many overlapping requests that get posted. One of the things I'm hoping our Curators will be able to help with, assuming we have enough of them, is to merge the requests together when they're for the same thing. That way the votes get put together.
 
I'll bite. I asked about play history. What does that have to do with voting? And what even is voting? I'm new to the forum.

best regards,

Chris
 
I'll bite. I asked about play history. What does that have to do with voting? And what even is voting? I'm new to the forum.

best regards,

Chris
Just having a very off topic conversation in this thread... At the top, next to your post, there's an up and down arrow for people to use to vote on this suggestion. Our team checks out the things that get the most votes (and everything else to be honest) to see what people are most interested in.
 
I believe we can make it so people have to be logged in to vote. Do you think that'd have more value?
I did not know that guests could vote.

In general, we try to consider higher voted ideas first, but it's a little tricky with so many overlapping requests that get posted. One of the things I'm hoping our Curators will be able to help with, assuming we have enough of them, is to merge the requests together when they're for the same thing. That way the votes get put together.
If I may be so presumptuous as to express my opinion, I see two flaws in this voting system.

  1. No one knows the reason for a negative vote.
  2. In a (small) community, it is easy to vote in favor of a post by an influential person (conversely, many posts by newcomers are easily overlooked or voted against.)
My concern is that newcomers will be demotivated by negative votes and quit submitting.

I think one of the problems could be solved by eliminating negative voting. Or modify it so that only the number of affirmative votes is shown on the forum. (In this case, voting by guests would not be a problem.)

However, if there is no problem with the current voting system for WiiM Team, then there is no room for me to interfere.

Thank you 🤗
 
I did not know that guests could vote.


If I may be so presumptuous as to express my opinion, I see two flaws in this voting system.

  1. No one knows the reason for a negative vote.
  2. In a (small) community, it is easy to vote in favor of a post by an influential person (conversely, many posts by newcomers are easily overlooked or voted against.)
My concern is that newcomers will be demotivated by negative votes and quit submitting.

I think one of the problems could be solved by eliminating negative voting. Or modify it so that only the number of affirmative votes is shown on the forum. (In this case, voting by guests would not be a problem.)

However, if there is no problem with the current voting system for WiiM Team, then there is no room for me to interfere.

Thank you 🤗
And like that, no one can downvote.
 
I agree, I have never seen the point in negative voting in this context, a not bothered is the same as a no for the purpose of feature requests.
Yeah, really the upvote is a way for us to see "how many people are interested in this". In that context, a downvote isn't very useful.
 
Yeah, really the upvote is a way for us to see "how many people are interested in this". In that context, a downvote isn't very useful.
IMHO a downvote means the downvoter isn't interested in the feature and they don't want anyone else to have it either 😃 The worst part is all voting is anonymous so when the same people downvote everything they can do it with impunity.
 
IMHO a downvote means the downvoter isn't interested in the feature and they don't want anyone else to have it either 😃 The worst part is all voting is anonymous so when the same people downvote everything they can do it with impunity.
Yeah, at times it feels we have a phantom downvoter as new suggestions often seems to be immediately downvoted. However, downvoting can have its use to express an opinion that development of the feature would divert resource from more worthy features, or that the request is niche or off the wall…
 
However, downvoting can have its use to express an opinion that development of the feature would divert resource from more worthy features, or that the request is niche or off the wall…
Isn't that why there is a comment form?🤔
 
Hey all, I've moved this discussion to a new thread. @Wiimer would you mind making your first post on that thread again? We can then edit your first post here and just pretend we had this whole conversations where it belongs :)
 
Downvoting a feature that someone else is interested in but not yourself always seems a bit selfish to me.
 
Taking away the down vote will hopefully encourage anyone who doesn't like an idea to come up with a better one to ensure their disliked one doesn't get the most votes. Positive rather than negative... May also smoke out the 'fantom downvoter' 🤣
 
Back
Top