Yes, I listened to my favourite playlist for 8 hours over iced teaSo what said the first tests???![]()

Yes, I listened to my favourite playlist for 8 hours over iced teaSo what said the first tests???![]()
At least in Germany, there was a disproportionately high price adjustment shortly before the introduction of lossless. This means that everyone is paying for the few who care about lossless... Another typical Spotify moveAt least for the moment…![]()
And what is the verdict?Yes, I listened to my favourite playlist for 8 hours over iced tea![]()
Yup, just for that I hope they will consider adding it (direct play to USB dacs) in the future. Tidal used to support it until about 2 years ago and for some reason removed it.If you like listening on the go with wired headphones and a good DAC, it could be relevant![]()
Same happened in Australia with premium price increases announced a week or two ago.At least in Germany, there was a disproportionately high price adjustment shortly before the introduction of lossless. This means that everyone is paying for the few who care about lossless... Another typical Spotify move![]()
And what is the verdict?
I haven't compared it with normal sound quality, but if I blind-tested it I might not notice any difference. But I do feel that the outline of each sound is sharper than before.
Can you expand on the "blind testing" setup? Were you testing Normal vs Lossless quality using Spotify, or Qobuz/Tidal vs Spotify Lossless? Because not noticing differences without evidence/knowledge with Qobuz/Tidal is a positive statement, while if is versus Normal quality is a negative statement.I haven't compared it with normal sound quality, but if I blind-tested it I might not notice any difference. But I do feel that the outline of each sound is sharper than before.
He hasn't done blind testing.Can you expand on the "blind testing" setup? Were you testing Normal vs Lossless quality using Spotify, or Qobuz/Tidal vs Spotify Lossless? Because not noticing differences without evidence/knowledge with Qobuz/Tidal is a positive statement, while if is versus Normal quality is a negative statement.
He hasn't done blind testing.
Yes, I didn't.Can you expand on the "blind testing" setup? Were you testing Normal vs Lossless quality using Spotify, or Qobuz/Tidal vs Spotify Lossless? Because not noticing differences without evidence/knowledge with Qobuz/Tidal is a positive statement, while if is versus Normal quality is a negative statement.
these audiophiles that are concerned with some compression and therefor switches service barely even register on spotify`s subscriber list. if they had any worries about loosing money they would probably have done it a long time ago.They missed the boat