iirc, it was in the link @Brantome posted that kicked this off again.How did you get that?
iirc, it was in the link @Brantome posted that kicked this off again.How did you get that?
That scenario would probably imply paying artists even less than they do today :-(
More teaser for the day!My fault again assuming people would open that link![]()
Not really. Scrap the free accounts, and implement a small charge to offset the price of the new lossless tier. Overall it balances out and they continue to pay the same to artists.That scenario would probably imply paying artists even less than they do today :-(
Can you play gapless?Qobuz can do Chromecast.
Strictly speaking, it doesn’t have native cast functionality like Spotify Connect, Tidal Connect or Amazon Music AlexaCast. Once they finally release Qobuz Connect, it will.You said Qobuz doesn't have a cast functionality. It does. When I want gapless I can use LMS
Spotify Connect has been there for quite some time and I agree that's it is one of the USPs, even if customers don't really know about it.Spotify as a music player is probably the most user-friendly app for me. I've never used Qobuz or Tidal, but Qobuz don't have a casting feature, and I often see Tidal Connect issues on this forum.
See I like tidal exactly because it doesn’t try and sell podcasts to meSpotify Connect has been there for quite some time and I agree that's it is one of the USPs, even if customers don't really know about it.
Right now I've just been comparing Tidal and Spotify for about 2 months. Right now I would say that Tidal is about on par. The app is juas as user friendly as Spotify and Tidal Connect is about as stable. What Tidal is missing is market share for their connect solution and podcasts. Podcasts. Even more podcasts. Music is not as essential to the young generation as it's been for us old farts. But podcasts are.
Right now, Tidal delivers better quality and better value for me, but not for my entire family.
No need to even mention Qobuz.
This tells me that you're an old man, just like me.See I like tidal exactly because it doesn’t try and sell podcasts to me
I've never been interested in podcasts until now. Recently, however, I've been listening to "ESL POD" to learn English. It's sleep learning.Spotify Connect has been there for quite some time and I agree that's it is one of the USPs, even if customers don't really know about it.
Right now I've just been comparing Tidal and Spotify for about 2 months. Right now I would say that Tidal is about on par. The app is juas as user friendly as Spotify and Tidal Connect is about as stable. What Tidal is missing is market share for their connect solution and podcasts. Podcasts. Even more podcasts. Music is not as essential to the young generation as it's been for us old farts. But podcasts are.
Right now, Tidal delivers better quality and better value for me, but not for my entire family.
No need to even mention Qobuz.
Chromecast is native to the Qobuz app, it is just not proprietary.Strictly speaking, it doesn’t have native cast functionality like Spotify Connect, Tidal Connect or Amazon Music AlexaCast. Once they finally release Qobuz Connect, it will.
Google Cast (which is the current correct name of the protocol) is very much proprietary. It's proprietary to Google.Chromecast is native to the Qobuz app, it is just not proprietary.
Now you are just being argumentative. Out of here.Google Cast (which is the current correct name of the protocol) is very much proprietary. It's proprietary to Google.
Qobuz (like everyone else who uses it, except Google) has no control over this protocol. They can use the API or leave it alone.
What are you talking about? You started splitting hairs for no obvious reason (maybe except defending your favourite streaming service lacking it's own casting solutions).Now you are just being argumentative. Out of here.