Spotify Spotify "Supremium"

We’ve seen these before from user seeing a code within the app but nothing materialized. Tidal simplified their plan cost that was aligned with Apple and Amazon. If tidal can afford to offer us lower cost, why Spotify can’t without raising its price for loseless?
 
I would gladly pay extra for Spotify pro. Because there is no Qobuz or Tidal in my country yet.
 
Just read this and I'm totaly shocked ... nearly double the population of the UK and certainly in your past an unbelievably advanced coutry in terms of technology ... I'm a bit gobsmacked.
As @Brantome said, I think there are licensing issues and market size. However, it is also true that it is called an IT backward country.
I don't know of any global apps from Japan. Maybe only Pokemon Go. 😂
 
Another teaser that has been going on in years. We will see many more teaser in decade to come. 😂

Agree with this .... be interesting to see how much it'd be as well, if it's more than Tidal, Amazon and Qobuz be a bit of a joke really.
 
Agree with this .... be interesting to see how much it'd be as well, if it's more than Tidal, Amazon and Qobuz be a bit of a joke really.
The individual Spotify "Premium" plan (limited to 320 kbps MP3) is already as expensive as the individual TIDAL plan (including HiRes) in Germany. The family plan is even more expensive than TIDAL's.

Consequently, the only way how Spotify "Superperpremiumfiything" could not be more than TIDAL would be Spotify giving it away for less than "Premium". ;)
 
I’d seriously consider Spotify hi res (or whatever they call it) if they also removed the one stream per account limitation it has. My family use echos with Amazon Music as its family subscription allows up to six simultaneous streams on one or more accounts. Spotify can’t do that so is a pain to use in a multi user, single Alexa account setup.
 
Back
Top