Let me clarify...Same width and length with a slim profileThat's a big-boy CD transport! Lots of empty space. Maybe they can use all that space for a crapton of vibration damping.![]()
Let me clarify...Same width and length with a slim profileThat's a big-boy CD transport! Lots of empty space. Maybe they can use all that space for a crapton of vibration damping.![]()
And with a LinkPlay module. That would allow it to be linked to the other WiiMs and provide Meta Data just as other linked devices and without taking up a digital input.1. Definitely a CD player. Don't make it portable. Don't make it steep. Just a DAC-less CD transport with a front drawer for loading.
Unfortunately, automatic meta data look up is generally very poor, and the results are frequently incorrect, and missing lots of information, and are also full of spelling mistakes.A wireless CD transport with automatic Meta Data lookup?!
View attachment 35718
With a LinkPlay module it will of course have network connectivity.A wireless CD transport with automatic Meta Data lookup?!
It could be the same people use for CD ripping. To my experience it's usually ok.Unfortunately, automatic meta data look up is generally very poor, and the results are frequently incorrect, and missing lots of information, and are also full of spelling mistakes.![]()
I've ripped a good number of CDs in my time and I'd say I've had reasonable accuracy with most CDs' automatic meta data pulls from the web. Probably 93-97% accurate.Unfortunately, automatic meta data look up is generally very poor, and the results are frequently incorrect, and missing lots of information, and are also full of spelling mistakes.![]()
That's exactly the problem I'm on about. I'm currently ripping a batch of CDs, and am having to do a lot of editing, and in many cases, completely typing in the track and artist information, as the automatic meta data search is failing miserably.It could be the same people use for CD ripping. To my experience it's usually ok.
I would think that I'm getting about 25% accuracy from automatic meta data information from the internet.I've ripped a good number of CDs in my time and I'd say I've had reasonable accuracy with most CDs' automatic meta data pulls from the web. Probably 93-97% accurate.
-Ed
Must be I listen to much more mainstream stuff then, if I had to guess.I would think that I'm getting about 25% accuracy from automatic meta data information from the internet.
It's possible to do like dBpoweramp and aggregate data from multiple sources. That gives a high accuracy.I would think that I'm getting about 25% accuracy from automatic meta data information from the internet.
Does that have a version for Mac computers?It's possible to do like dBpoweramp and aggregate data from multiple sources. That gives a high accuracy.
I think so, why. It's not about that product. Only about the algorithm used to get CD Meta Data. I think they call it PerfectMeta.Does that have a version for Mac computers?
I would be interested to know where it tries to obtain the CD meta data from.I think so, why. It's not about that product. Only about the algorithm used to get CD Meta Data. I think they call it PerfectMeta.
When I rip CDs, I do it on a Mac, and I use dBpoweramp CD Ripper. When multiple entries show up for the same CD in the database, it presents them all for you to pick from.Does that have a version for Mac computers?
I think I have tried it on a PC, and it wasn't really any better than how I am doing it now.When I rip CDs, I do it on a Mac, and I use dBpoweramp CD Ripper. When multiple entries show up for the same CD in the database, it presents them all for you to pick from.
-Ed