Can you expand on what you mean by 'better' in this context?
How does changing a cable alter the signal ? I was under the impression that it either works or it doesn't. What am I missing?
Note that I only experienced a change from using a really cheap analog cable.
Maybe it was poorly shielded and carried a lot of noise through to the dac.
Maybe it wasn't quite as good at keeping the digital eye pattern open.
Whatever it was, it sounded duller, muffled, flat, less enjoyable. No fancy analogies here, essentially just 'worse'.
Yes, I might even say that using a different cable was like lifting a curtain... (you know who I'm teasing here!).
I can only say that it was a very obvious difference, similar to the difference between using the pro's dac and analog out (with the same 'decent' analog interconnects) to my amp vs pro's digital out to my dac/amp. The former was, again, significantly worse.
Generally I'm with you - if the sender can send the pulses correctly, the cable can transmit the signal with minimal degradation and the receiver can clock it correctly (and half the point of a "digital" signal is that it is much more tolerant of degradation), how can it make a difference?
I'm mostly assuming noise, hence things like galvanic isolation on dac inputs.