That's barbaricWe want a full report!
Ps: i was shown this screen 2 days ago, but until now no lossless option …![]()
That's barbaricWe want a full report!
Ps: i was shown this screen 2 days ago, but until now no lossless option …![]()
It's questionable if WIIM actually is playing the lossless audio. When playing the lossless option is still greyed out. And when trying to switch it on the message says "this device is not suited for lossless playback, try an othe device..."View attachment 26781
Wiim Pro PlusWhich WiiM device are you trying to connect to?
Seems like you connect trough chromecast? You should be able to use Spotify Connect. And are you on the same Wifichannel?.. is your Wiim updated?Wiim Pro Plus
SW, FW and phone are up-to-date. Restrating my phone did the trick! Thanks Eddiefreddie.Seems like you connect trough chromecast? You should be able to use Spotify Connect. And are you on the same Wifichannel?.. is your Wiim updated?
With me instant succesful connection.
If nothing helps reboot device and your phone. It should work.
It’s said it’s available on USA but I haven’t got the update. Usually USA get it first.I’m in the USA and have been a Spotify Premium sub for years. Love the interface. I also have Amazon Music HD for the lossless. I hate the interface and it’s always unstable on my WiiM products so I hardly use it. To be honest, the Spotify usually sounded better to me anyway. I assume it’s in the mastering. Can’t wait to drop Amazon and simplify things. Let’s go Spotify. Waiting for my update. Oh, a the bonus is no additional cost to me. I thought I was going to have to pay more.
Whats your impression on the lossless option in respect to 320kbit?SW, FW and phone are up-to-date. Restrating my phone did the trick! Thanks Eddiefreddie.
Cheaper if you can stay with one single provider. If you need two because family wants Spotify and it runs in wearable for running, and you want at least Loseless, it's always doubling the cost.Just my opinion. Spotify has introduced lossless playback, too late. After years of empty promises, I got rid of it and switched to Qobuz and Tidal, and I don't intend to go back.
Why? Simple. I don't see why I should pay more to those who offer less. Their maximum quality is 24/44.
I can't hear the difference with 24/192? Maybe, but others offer it at a lower price.
Conclusion? They can keep their lossless. They missed the boat, and I'm happy even without Spotify.
When 24/192khz was released on many song on tidal, I thought it would give me a wow factor like the same feeling going from vhs to blu ray. In fact, it did not blow my socks at all. Because the native resolution when music was recorded on 16/44 and going to 24/192 was just upsampling that causing aliasing and glare. It may be different if was originally recorded natively on that resolution.Seemingly with 24/44.1 they’re catering for everyone apart from bats, owls and Greater Wax Moths
The use of high bit rates (24/96 or higher) already started in the late 1990s and early 2000s. So most music recorded after that have this resolution available natively. Also remastering of old analog tape recordings will have the high bit rate.When 24/192khz was released on many song on tidal, I thought it would give me a wow factor like the same feeling going from vhs to blu ray. In fact, it did not blow my socks at all. Because the native resolution when music was recorded on 16/44 and going to 24/192 was just upsampling that causing aliasing and glare. It may be different if was originally recorded natively on that resolution.
Simon and Garfunkel “sound of silence” is one of them that did not improved on its original version.The use of high bit rates (24/96 or higher) already started in the late 1990s and early 2000s. So most music recorded after that have this resolution available natively. Also remastering of old analog tape recordings will have the high bit rate.
So the CD quality recordings are mostly from the 80's and early 90's. If you see a 192 kHz version of a track from that time it's probably upsampled.
If it matters is hard to say. I can sometimes hear the difference between 16/44.1 and 24/96 but never between 96 kHz and 192 kHz.
That is recorded on analog, so not sure what you meanSimon and Garfunkel “sound of silence” is one of them that did not improved on its original version.
I „think“ I hear the difference between 320kbit and 24bit/96kHz in form of more realistic and deeper room acoustic! I am 100% certain I will not hear the difference between 24bit/44kHz and 24bit/96kHz, not even mentioning higher resolution!Seemingly with 24/44.1 they’re catering for everyone apart from bats, owls and Greater Wax Moths