Features wanted in a Wiim Ultra 2

@harkpabst "I don't think so."


OK. then... if you make the statement.. then prove it. Why?

Let me prove my assertion. Today's listening set up... picture attached below.

Example.... a Fostex Wideband speaker like the FF225WK or FF165WK or FF105WK or FF103NV2 in the appropiate cabinet... cost well under 1000.

Much less than 1000..

Amplifiers... First Watt F6, F4, F5, XA252

More 2ch systems systems

Aleph 2 monoblocks to Maggie 1.7
Dual bridged F4 with FE22 step up to Audio Note AN K/LX
Marantz 2325 to ADS L810

I do have to admit, that as currently configured, the HT evens it out... Nuforce MCA20 to PSB Stratus Goldi... but that's for movies.

Most of the audiophiles I know, are in the same boat as I am. Amps more expensive than speakers.

In the market place... look at the Marantz separates... the amp runs $4K... what kind of speakers do you think they're being matched to?

Even in the NCore, Purify world. where the opportunity exists to flip the score... still, the amps are running into $2K... and way more.

In my experience, you can make a very good sounding speaker for not so much money... if you step away from the multi driver monstrosities and specify good sound and good Impulse Response.

Of course, as the link you and I shared elsewhere... where Bruno Putzeys described, it is possible- and desireable- to blend speaker, amp and DSP.. But until then, speakers tend to run less than amplifiers. And the end result, for the time being, is still quite expensive..


Yes, I would like to see a WiiM Ultra DSP that can do FIR filters for its room correction.
 

Attachments

  • 20260222_132717.jpg
    20260222_132717.jpg
    140.9 KB · Views: 8
Last edited:
@harkpabst "I don't think so."


OK. then... if you make the statement.. then prove it. Why?

Let me prove my assertion. Today's listening set up... picture attached below.

Example.... a Fostex Wideband speaker like the FF225WK or FF165WK or FF105WK or FF103NV2 in the appropiate cabinet... cost well under 1000.

Much less than 1000..

Amplifiers... First Watt F6, F4, F5, XA252

More 2ch systems systems

Aleph 2 monoblocks to Maggie 1.7
Dual bridged F4 with FE22 step up to Audio Note AN K/LX
Marantz 2325 to ADS L810

I do have to admit, that as currently configured, the HT evens it out... Nuforce MCA20 to PSB Stratus Goldi... but that's for movies.

Most of the audiophiles I know, are in the same boat as I am. Amps more expensive than speakers.

In the market place... look at the Marantz separates... the amp runs $4K... what kind of speakers do you think they're being matched to?

Even in the NCore, Purify world. where the opportunity exists to flip the score... still, the amps are running into $2K... and way more.

In my experience, you can make a very good sounding speaker for not so much money... if you step away from the multi driver monstrosities and specify good sound and good Impulse Response.

Of course, as the link you and I shared elsewhere... where Bruno Putzeys described, it is possible- and desireable- to blend speaker, amp and DSP.. But until then, speakers tend to run less than amplifiers. And the end result, for the time being, is still quite expensive..


Yes, I would like to see a WiiM Ultra DSP that can do FIR filters for its room correction.
This seems like a strange take. The way I see it, the choice of speaker (and subwoofer) has, not counting the room itself and its treatments, the greatest overall effect on what finally hits your ears (both because of the natural, anechoic tonality) as well as the way they interact with the room and how they can be placed. It seems to me that the largest portion of the budget should be dedicated to the absolute optimization of the speakers & sub to the room as well as ultimately suiting the taste of the listener in terms of tonality (I readily accept that not all listeners love Harman in-room-tilt as I do).

For example, my dad has a fully treated, dedicated listening room in his house. The room itself is quite narrow proportionally versus length/depth, so his choice of Magnepan LRS+ works exceptionally well because they minimize side wall interaction. The room itself also isn’t, as a whole, very large, and it’s fully enclosed since all doors are closeable, and he’s running the Rythmik L12 sub I gave him for foundation and low-end extension. This is a great setup for that room. He is also a generation older than I and for reasons of age prefer a brighter speaker to make up for lower high-frequency hearing sensitivity. Given his smaller room and the help of the sub, he is more than happy with the Topping B200s driving his Maggies.

Conversely, I do not have a dedicated listening space and must make do with a shared space that acts as family room and my home office for my system, and it must be placed sideways in the room so depth is much less than width. I do listen loud frequently, so I wanted speakers that have lower compression when cranked up, and I listen to music and movies with quite a bit more foundational bass, so for me, the MoFi SourcePoint 8 have proven to be the perfect solution in conjunction with an SVS SB-3000. These speakers are reasonably sensitive and not low-impedance, so the Topping B200s are more than sufficient to drive them as well.

In my dad’s case, you’re right, his amps cost more than his speakers, but in my case, they’re quite a lot less, and I frankly do not see how other amps would provide any improvement over my B200s in my setup.

-Ed
 
Well.... we agree on the room.. which is almost a given on the search for good sound. Then you need to match your system to the room as well. Room correction should be considered fourth after getting the room right, matching the system to the room and then bass waveforming.

If those things are all taken care of, an otherwise modest system will excel.

After that, it becomes a matter of taste... because mixing and matching components becomes a matter of how you want your music to sound like.

Maggies are actually sort of a outlier. I have them. You need really powerful amps and yet very clean amps because they are very revealing. And making a power amp that can also sound very detailed is... hard and expensive. You can get a new pair of 1.7 for 2200 bucks, a used one for 1400. The amps to drive them.. ay! Being dipole, you really don't need a subwoofer, it's hard to match a subwoofer with a big planar.

I'm running mine with 200 wpc monoblocks... big monsters. Aleph 2s. I joke that while Nelson Pass says that the First Watt is the most important, with Maggies, it's the First Ten Watts. ;-)

Speaking of amps... well... I just blew two Fostex speakers today. Latest amp threw some DC... looks like it failed... It took some Foxtex drivers that are run wideband. At least this amp didn't throw smoke like the one three years ago... thing is speaker protection can get in the way of the sound... so often, it doesn't go in... I think this amp overheated, I had it biased nicely but... my fault... I didn't give it enough room to breathe.

Oh well, live and learn. If an amp fails... don't plug it on the other speaker... :-(

Now then, pretty much what happens, IMHO, is that you can get a pretty good speaker for not too much money. Your SourcePoint 8s are an example. I mean, for not so much money, you have a superb soundstage and greater dynamics than most speakers out there.. including the SourcePoint 10. A good amp on those things, like an SIT, with only 30 watts will blow you mind. And, being two ways, they have very reasonable behavior in the time domain.

BTW, hint... see if you can find a low mileage Nuforce STA200 or Job 225.
 
Last edited:
@harkpabst "I don't think so."


OK. then... if you make the statement.. then prove it. Why?
What a strange reaction. It's not a statement. He simply said that he doesn't think it is true that amps should be more expensive than speakers. Why are so many "audiophiles" judging gear by price-tag? It's no metric for quality in any way.
Let me prove my assertion.
And then goes on to tell anecdotes about all kinds of gear while making BS statements and does not prove anything.
Do you read the things you write yourself?
 
Last edited:
What a strange reaction. It's not a statement. He simply said that he doesn't think it is true that amps should be more expensive than speakers. Why are so many "audiophiles" judging gear by price-tag? It's no metric for quality in any way.

And then goes on to tell anecdotes about all kinds of gear while making BS statements and does not prove anything.
Do you read the things you write yourself?
Read back, I made an assertion that amps are more expensive than speakers... hence the whole point.. He replied with another assertion stating otherwise.

"saying" something is making "statement".

Hmm.. I wrote examples of systems I have at home with amps that are more expensive that speakers

Heck, if anything, YOU are the one making the point that price it is not important... which is actually a DIFFERENT assertion. With which I actually agree with. Indeed, I brought up the point that speakers that sound good can be made for not a lot of money.

However, in the quest for good sounding we follow simplicity, which Fostex widebanders indeed are... which makes them fragile though.. just as today my latest amp smoked two of them. And of course, the amp also lacks speaker protection, because being simple it actually sounds better.

Yes, I do indeed read what I write... except perhaps you are not or are not understanding what I'm writing or maybe it's just late in Europe.

Whatever... I'm eating 200 bucks today for the replacement drivers... so, I guess I'm making the speakers more expensive than the amps today...

Anyhow, have fun.

What would you like in the Ultra Two?
 
Back
Top