Features wanted in a Wiim Ultra 2

Hmm... you don't like the Mesh? I got the Multibit DAC with Unison USB and I love how they sound.

I was thinking of going to the Jotunheim 3 but maybe I should rethink it? Why don't you like it?

I mean, I could save a bit and then get the Yggdrasil Singular. For headphone amp... well, I do have a DIY Whammy (set for opamp rolling) and the Nitsch (with analog inputs) so I could use those for the headphones.

I'm reading into the Geshelli... thanks, interesting... but first, drivers coming in... shipping amp to get it fixed/updated. I think it overheated, we'll see.
Oh no, I absolutely love the Jotunheim 3 itself. It is easily the best head-amp I've owned; it destroys the L30 II I had prior (I did not yet own the Aeon 2s back when I had an L70 on hand). I did not understand just how good my Dan Clark Aeon 2 Noires could be until I got this amp. It's just Mesh that's a letdown; I much, MUCH preferred feeding Jot 3 from a Topping E50 II over the integrated Mesh card. I have a FiiO DM15 R2R coming in that I will try feeding the Jot 3 with to see how that goes.

-Ed
 
The Nitsch has an upgraded analog circuit from the Jotunheim circuit. But it has the multibit DAC and unison USB as an option.

It runs about 750 bucks and it's only made in batches. I think he's about to release another batch. Have not seen any of them on the used market.
 
The Nitsch has an upgraded analog circuit from the Jotunheim circuit. But it has the multibit DAC and unison USB as an option.

It runs about 750 bucks and it's only made in batches. I think he's about to release another batch. Have not seen any of them on the used market.
Technically, the Jot 3 will accept older DAC cards from the Jot 2, but I personally see no point in it for myself.

Anyhow--we are way, way off topic.

-Ed
 
I don’t think it makes sense to say specifically upgrade power supply , clocks , analogue stages with this and that etc … . We don’t know more than Wiim . Let them do their research and evaluation . We can only judge the usability of features and perceived sound quality
 
I don’t think it makes sense to say specifically upgrade power supply , clocks , analogue stages with this and that etc … . We don’t know more than Wiim . Let them do their research and evaluation . We can only judge the usability of features and perceived sound quality

I think what makes sense is that we all want different things.... so likely a single upgrade is not for everybody.

My list is based upon my current equipment and how it sounds and what I'm willing to spend on convenience to have it all in one box.

Others have their own prioritites.

It's up to the project managers and marketing/sales guys to figure out which product(s) to fund. For that, they listen to their market. And in reality, as the customers, we do know more than WiiM.

Anyhow, what would you want in a WiiM Ultra?
 
It’s always xlr balanced being requested when it does not improve sound quality. It matters if they running a long distance but amp and streamer are next to each other for most setup. We have too many rookie in this forum.
It's not even / only about improving the sound. Some people already have XLR cables and other devices uses XLR (in some cases only XLR)

I know I said that before, but no matter what, I would not like to see the Wiim Ultra v2 taller. It could be wider
 
I think what makes sense is that we all want different things.... so likely a single upgrade is not for everybody.

My list is based upon my current equipment and how it sounds and what I'm willing to spend on convenience to have it all in one box.

Others have their own prioritites.

It's up to the project managers and marketing/sales guys to figure out which product(s) to fund. For that, they listen to their market. And in reality, as the customers, we do know more than WiiM.

Anyhow, what would you want in a WiiM Ultra?
A high quality , very good sounding streaming dac and transport ( better than the competition) , reliable build quality that will last for many years, with great usability and support . I will leave it as general as that . The price point I am ready to pay if it is worth it is up to 600 euro .
 
I would rather have a Dirac Live equivalent to the Room Correction. Or maybe add 2.1 Dirac Live in the future. But Dirac charges an arm and a leg.
 
Full MiniDSP capabilities with DIRAC options 😊

And then it'll cost.... 600 for the Ultra and 1000 for the software licenses.... to be honest, I'd rather not do any room correction in the Ultra as that implies something modyfing the data in the music files.
 
And then it'll cost.... 600 for the Ultra and 1000 for the software licenses.... to be honest, I'd rather not do any room correction in the Ultra as that implies something modyfing the data in the music files.
Not sure of your point about not wanting the WiiM to do any room correction.

Are you saying you want no room correction at all or just want it done at a different spot? Whether DIRAC or internally in the WiiM, both are manipulating digital data with DIRAC just being a fancier version of what the WiiM is doing.

So, if you do room correction before an external DAC, digital data is still being modified. If you do it after the DAC, then you are either doing it in analog or it's running through an ADC, being digitally corrected, and run through a second DAC. It makes no sense to convert digital to analog and then back to digital for processing before going analog a second time.
 
Not sure of your point about not wanting the WiiM to do any room correction.

Are you saying you want no room correction at all or just want it done at a different spot? Whether DIRAC or internally in the WiiM, both are manipulating digital data with DIRAC just being a fancier version of what the WiiM is doing.

So, if you do room correction before an external DAC, digital data is still being modified. If you do it after the DAC, then you are either doing it in analog or it's running through an ADC, being digitally corrected, and run through a second DAC. It makes no sense to convert digital to analog and then back to digital for processing before going analog a second time.
He’s a purist.

-Ed
 
Aaa... mean....

I use the WiiM solely as a bridge between Android/Chromebook and the USB DAC. Preserves the bit perfect interface all the way to the DAC. Currently both Android and Chromebooks reclock the bit rates. As it now stands, yes, I'm getting more and more purist.

Less is indeed more. Took out out the tube preamp out from between the DAC and the amp made the sound much more cleaner. Used the preamp built into the headphone amp in the DAC... it can swing a lot of volts...

There is always a risk, of course... amp might be over biased (ooops), overheats (ratz!) and blows itself AND whatever is hooked up to it (wideband driver).

Purist for sure... (OK, I am planning to bass waveform the office, but only between 30 and 80 Hz. I don't need no auto correlation. And.. thing is, I change stuff around.. so I would be constantly changing settings.
 
Last edited:
Yep... I think we all want different things for the Ultra Mk II.

I suppose this is good for the WiiM group... just make sure to have the Ultra Cryo... with cryogenic cabling and a graphic of the Tice Clock on the screen.
 
Back
Top