The individual Spotify "Premium" plan (limited to 320 kbps MP3) is already as expensive as the individual TIDAL plan (including HiRes) in Germany. The family plan is even more expensive than TIDAL's.
Consequently, the only way how Spotify "Superperpremiumfiything" could not be more than TIDAL would be Spotify giving it away for less than "Premium".![]()
In my opinion, Spotify would be very short sighted if they priced themselves out of the hi res market if they charge considerably more than their competitors. Ok, maybe the “audiophile” market isn’t large compared to their entire user base, but they do have a pretty good app…
I don't find the Spotify app is anything better than Tidal or Deezer apps. Each has its own strengths and weaknesses. You pays your money and takes your choice. In fact Deezer's live radio streams are unique, as are Tidal video streams. My use I s essentially Deezer,, Tidal and then Spotify. German Dutch users also have audiobooks with Deezer.Spotify have a better app and a larger database of music than the other services, so if the entire database will be lossless CD-quality i guess a little higher prices than Tidal/Qobuz/Apple Music can be justified![]()
And still it will be more expensive ...Think Brantome's response reiterates exactly what I've been saying
Just my opinion, to each his own ;-)And dont know if its too late.
I understand what you are saying i would stay with Tidal but i,mkeeping Spotify too.
Each has its own benefits in my opinion.
Let's wait what Spotify is going to do.
I heard the lyrics will be only for paying users, quality will be too ofcourse, hopefully the better AI functions available..
Again I can understand your reaction but dont underestimate Spotify.
For me im keeping both Tidal, Spotify.
I totally can understand what you're saying.Just my opinion, to each his own ;-)
I still remember how excited I was about Spotify when I started steaming music more than ten years ago... A wonderful time of enthusiasm.
Fortunately, there are several providers. Spotify strung me too long in terms of Losless and I've realized in the last two years that I don't miss them. Not at all.
I agree the app is very good.Like many I would have loved Spotify to have gone lossless years ago. I loved the user interface and recommendations. Superb library too.
But now, for me personally, I don’t see how it can compete financially with the other major streaming services IF it increases its price once (IF) it releases a lossless tier. For me at £9.99 per month it’s already more than 3 times the price of Tidal here.
I wonder if they might scrap their free accounts? Hope that current member using it for free would pay a small fee, and thereby be able to keep the paid/lossless tiers cheaper? Just a thoughtI agree the app is very good.
I hope the will give their paying subscribers more options,more quality.
We all know the good recommendations are as good as the ones who doesn't pay... aren't they?
And the podcast will be the same for free subscribers..with adds that is.
Again I hope they will give more for the paying customers.. quality on better options and the quality of the music itself.
I'm think they will. We will see. Don't underestimate Spotify.
I will keep Tidal also no matter what Spotify does.
Very good streaming service.
Can understand very well what you're saying.I wonder if they might scrap their free accounts? Hope that current member using it for free would pay a small fee, and thereby be able to keep the paid/lossless tiers cheaper? Just a thought
I was just trying to think of a scenario whereby Spotify could introduce lossless, keep costs down, and maintain their profits. Probably completely wrong. I usually am!Can understand very well what you're saying.
I mean YouTube is a great service I I'm a paid subscriber for YouTube too..I'm using it for video sometimes for watching music videos.
So does Spotify has to fear people are going to YouTube music when they are letting go their free subscription?
Wouldn't they make profit at last, and will their service profit overall?
Maybe they would have the confidence to know customers are willing to pay? .. the conviction YouTube music isn't the same alternative..
The trust their service its worth to pay for...its worth it in my opinion.
I was just trying to think of a scenario whereby Spotify could introduce lossless, keep costs down, and maintain their profits.
How did you get that?