Are audio reviewers making stuff up?

One thing is also obvious: Arcam is a longstanding UK based Amp Manufacturer with excellent reputation! WiiM is a US base „nobody“ with great streamers at a nonsense price that now also wants to play in the Amp, Loudspeaker, Subs and other sectors.
Darko is a UK citizen…

Any questions?
Thought he was Australian with homes in Berlin and Lisbon? Might be a nationalised UK citizen admittedly…
 
One thing is also obvious: Arcam is a longstanding UK based Amp Manufacturer with excellent reputation! WiiM is a US base „nobody“ with great streamers at a nonsense price that now also wants to play in the Amp, Loudspeaker, Subs and other sectors.
Darko is a UK citizen…

Any questions?

not so much a question, more an oberservation. Surely Darko is no more bias than people in forums seeking validation echoes for their choices and views or posting poorly researched answers to peoples questions.
In fact he has a reputation to uphold, so if his views and reviews were poorly judged or only based on commercial interest im pretty sure he would not be as succesful as he obviously is, maybe there is a little jealousy at play :unsure:.
The level of useful information you can find via youtube and forums from accross the world is informative and empowering, but of course like has always been the way since the dawn of civilisation, spotting the 'BS' is part of the game.
 
Last edited:
just to play 'devils advocate' wouldnt a separate power supply be easier to replace if needed and mean more space and less heat in the main unit .. :unsure:
It's fine if a design designates the power supply to be an external unit. Not my favorite but legitimate.
My point is about devices with built-in power supplies, which some "high-end" manufacturers offer "upgrades" for in the form of an extra unit. E.g. Naim.
If I were to review such equipment, it would fail the test the minute I saw that extra unit. It either means that the equipment is faulty by design in the first place or that someone is trying to bullshxt his customers.
 
Last edited:
not so much a question, more an oberservation. Surely Darko is no more bias than people in forums seeking validation echoes for their choices and views or posting poorly researched answers to peoples questions.
In fact he has a reputation to uphold, so if his views and reviews were poorly judged or only based on commercial interest im pretty sure he would not be as succesful as he obviously is, maybe there is a little jealousy at play :unsure:.
The level of useful information you can find via youtube and forums from accross the world is informative and empowering, but of course like has always been the way since the dawn of civilisation, spotting the 'BS' is part of the game.
Jealousy of what?

Certainly you are right about the confirmation bias most have who are not aware of it…
 
Thought he was Australian with homes in Berlin and Lisbon? Might be a nationalised UK citizen admittedly…

He was brought up in the UK before relocating to Australia and then Germany where he is now based, although he also has a home in Lisbon... but other than that he keeps details of his personal life under wraps.
 
Then again, his livelihood depends on him being able to "hear" and describe differences bewteen components.
Note that this isn't really true. Livelihood of audio reviewers depends on creating content people want to consume.

The fact that reviewers may report to hear differences where there may be none doesn't necessarily mean they are actively trying to fool anyone or intentionally make stuff up. They are human and so subject to the same biases as the rest of us - regardless if we are aware of these biases or not.

But that means that we shouldn't put too much faith in *anyone's* opinion if it isn't backed by robust data.
By data I don't mean just measurements - listening tests can produce very hard data too, as long as they are done in a sufficiently rigorous way - i.e. accurately level-matched, without knowing which device we're listening to, and repeated enough times to reach statistical significance.
 
Serious question. I recently watched a video by Darko, in which he compares a 75 watt Arcam Class A/B integrated amp to the Wiim amp ultra.
He makes some startling claims... He implies that the Arcam is more powerful than the Wiim. Really? Watts are watts! 100 watts > 75 watts. He then goes into detail about how the Arcam is more this, more that than the Wiim.
I myself know the Wiim compares favorably to my former high end system of Naim separates. What Darko says baffles me.
Then again, his livelihood depends on him being able to "hear" and describe differences bewteen components. He is either fooling himself, or outright making stuff up.
It's like movie reviews, music, theatre reviews, etc. It is one person's thinking and opinion.
As far as A/B vs D, A/B is still preferable IMO. More beef in the stew. Assuming amps are with speakers that can show that. Remember, he usually uses the best — whatever, he has in for review. Almost always, it is top of the line or at least mid model of the top of the line brands. So great speakers will really show the difference between components. If you have middling speakers, it might not matter A/B or D. I made the opposite mistake decades ago. The stereo store guy said X brand amp would work with my Magnepans. Well, it did but it was not really ideal at all. Now I know. Magnepans need not watts per-say but the amp version of BEEF which costs some $$$€€€. I only had chicken scratch at the time. My amp died a decade sooner then it should have. It was more like a turkey sandwich. But that salesman got his spiff.
(Spiff is slang for an immediate bonus for a sale. Typically, spiffs are paid, either by a manufacturer or employer, directly to a salesperson for selling a specific product. Be it best for the shopper or NOT. Usually not.)
 
Back
Top