What exactly do you mean by that? Noise level on the speaker output when nothing is played?Is it possible to measure residual noise?
What exactly do you mean by that? Noise level on the speaker output when nothing is played?Is it possible to measure residual noise?
crosstalk vs frequency...(at 1w or 5w..)
I regret having written that... as it stands, don't waste your time on these measures and more importantly, don't take any risks by raising the levelsVs frequency or vs level? Stepped sine with one channel driven but second one captured?
It's around 125-135 uV unweighted in 10-22400 Hz span, when output is not muted - for example when digital input is active or very low level signal (aka "silence") is played. It's less for idle mode when HiFi/Ethernet input is use, but I do not remember the exact value.I don't understand proper English.
This is my TPA3255 amp and AVR spec sheet. I think it's noise when it's silent.
View attachment 3963
View attachment 3964
Thank you!It's around 125-135 uV unweighted in 10-22400 Hz span, when output is not muted - for example when digital input is active or very low level signal (aka "silence") is played. It's less for idle mode when HiFi/Ethernet input is use, but I do not remember the exact value.
I believe you are thinking "4 ohm droops, 8 ohm peaks, 6 ohm should therefore be pretty flat": yes, with a resistor. But speakers never have a flat impedance, and generally it rises at high frequencies, where the output impedance of this thing (per the graph in the 1st post) is rising. Which surprising myself makes me conclude...maybe it's not such an awful problem? Though if would be nice if they implemented the Post-Filter FeedBack.Regarding load dependence, is there an issue when impedance of the loudspeaker is 6 Ohms? The KEF LS50 Meta has a 6 Ohm impedance at higher frequencies.
Remote is RF or IR?
Or less pessimistically or less cynically, they’re doing what many also do in having a limited first production run to gauge the market’s appetite for the device then ramp up subsequent productions runs to meet demand, almost mirroring what they did a year ago with the Pro?Currently out of stock, probably awaiting some hardware and software changes? This is reminding me of Apple and Tesla, the new method, get it out their to the eager Beta newbies then recalibrate and fix.
Nah, ya gotta retest the fixed version! Meanwhile thanks SO SO SO much for actual MEASUREMENTS in a review. That is a godsend.Or maybe that's all, folks
So if the subwoofer has LPF set to anything less than say 120hz would this be a problem in reality?As I got yet another interface - UCX II, quick test to verify if something has changed in terms of sub out performance. No, no change
View attachment 4132
And it seems to be fixed indeed, looks like no drifting.Latest FW promises fixes for clock drifting when toslink input is used. I didn't mention it but I've seen it reported by REW.
A signal sent to the SW from the Amp has quite high amount of harmonic distortions. Higher level harmonics can be filtered out by the LPF of SW, but usually at least 2nd one will remain
View attachment 4135
As I got yet another interface - UCX II, quick test to verify if something has changed in terms of sub out performance. No, no change
View attachment 4132
Then for example the 3rd harmonic of 25 Hz and the 2nd of 37.5 Hz will be still in the range easily.If so, what if you set the WiiM’s crossover to 75?
If I lower the subwoofer volume level on my WiiM amp and increase the volume of the subwoofer, will it have less effect?Then for example the 3rd harmonic of 25 Hz and the 2nd of 37.5 Hz will be still in the range easily.
You can see that hereIf I lower the subwoofer volume level on my WiiM amp and increase the volume of the subwoofer, will it have less effect?
(Of course, I hope the WiiM team solves this problem.)
Thank youYou can see that here
Distortions are fine up to -15 dBFS, then it starts to grow rapidly.