Query - PEQ for Wiim Amp and Monitor Audio Bronze 100

Vicious

Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2025
Messages
97
Howdy!

Recently swapped my Polk XT15's for the Monitor Audio Bronze 100's, got them for a great price.

These are paired up with a Polk PSW10 10" sub, that's at 60% volume, and on my Wiim Amp set to -3db's, some of the bass is coming from the MA 100's.

The Room Correction is giving me rather thin PEQ's, that don't sound full - As a result, I kept the EQ on flat for now which feels and sounds like the best for now on the current kit I have.

I'm trying to find a PEQ for the Wiim Amp and MA Bronze 100's, but can't find anything, and hoped someone here has a basic PEQ to start off with, bands that I can maybe start with as a baseline?

Thanks :D
 
I'm trying to find a PEQ for the Wiim Amp and MA Bronze 100's, but can't find anything, and hoped someone here has a basic PEQ to start off with, bands that I can maybe start with as a baseline?
This is pretty much impossible.

The Amp itself is tonally transparent and doesn't need EQ. The speakers may or may not benefit from specific EQ. It probably would, but spinorama.org has no data about the Bronze 100, yet, so you would have to do your own (quasi-anechoic) measurements. The room still has the biggest influence and this is different for every single room and every speaker placement.

On top of that, you are using a sub, so it's not just about a base EQ for your mains.

The Room Correction is giving me rather thin PEQ's, that don't sound full - As a result, I kept the EQ on flat for now which feels and sounds like the best for now on the current kit I have.
So, automatic RC gives you a thinner overall sound than no EQ at all?

Can you post your set of settings for the room correction runs? Which microphone and phone are you using?
 
Last edited:
This is pretty much impossible.

The Amp itself is finally transparent and doesn't need EQ. The speakers may or may not benefit from specific EQ. It probably would, but spinorama.org has no data about the Bronze 100, yet, so you would have to do your own (quasi-anechoic) measurements. The room still has the biggest influence and this is different for every single room and every speaker placement.

On top of that, you are using a sub, so it's not just about a base EQ for your mains.


So, automatic RC gives you a thinner overall sound than no EQ at all?

Can you post your set of settings for the room correction runs? Which microphone and phone are you using?
Ah fully understand

I’ve been using my iPhone without its case.

I’m not home at the moment so i’ll do another run later and share my RC results, seems i’ve saved over my previous run :(

Side question before running RC, because the MA Bronze 100’s go quite low, does that mean the crossover at 70-80 is ideal, or is it best to stick to the norm of 80?
 
Ah fully understand

I’ve been using my iPhone without its case.

I’m not home at the moment so i’ll do another run later and share my RC results, seems i’ve saved over my previous run :(

Side question before running RC, because the MA Bronze 100’s go quite low, does that mean the crossover at 70-80 is ideal, or is it best to stick to the norm of 80?
IMG_0590.png
WhatsApp Image 2025-06-08 at 11.49.12.jpeg
WhatsApp Image 2025-06-08 at 11.49.13.jpeg
 

Attachments

  • WhatsApp Image 2025-06-08 at 11.49.13.jpeg
    WhatsApp Image 2025-06-08 at 11.49.13.jpeg
    40.5 KB · Views: 7
Last edited:
Side question before running RC, because the MA Bronze 100’s go quite low, does that mean the crossover at 70-80 is ideal, or is it best to stick to the norm of 80?
The Bronze 100 may go low for their size (honestly, I don't know), but this shouldn't be your first concern when integrating.them with your sub.

There is still a school of thought myth that for music main speakers must play full range and the subwoofer should just "augment" below their "natural" roll-off. If this works for anybody (by chance), then fine, but this is crap, nonetheless. The Bronze 100 still relatively compact 2-way speakers and the benefit of a properly managed sub is not just to add lower bass (some are really just seeking for louder bass). The sub can also relieve the main speakers (and amplifier) from excessive cone excursion (and power demands). In particular for 2-way or full range speakers reducing cone excursion is essential for reducing distortion and improving midrange clarity. This only works if the main speakers can be properly high pass filtered. The WiiM Amp, Amp Pro, Ultra and upcoming Amp Ultra can do just that.

To maximise the benefits from this approach you would want to cross the sub as high as possible. Obviously, there are limits to this approach. Many subwoofers don't play well (by design) above 100 Hz, very few are usable up to 200 Hz. Also, the sub may become acoustically localisable when playing higher than ~80 Hz, depending on the steepness of the low pass filter. In my personal experience you can get away with a single subwoofer crossed at ~110 Hz if it can be placed fully symmetrically between the main speakers. If the sub is sitting somewhere in the corner it's best left at ~80 Hz, or maybe a tad lower.

The next thing to consider is that choosing the best crossover frequency and room placement for the sub can help to reduce room effects. However, to make use of that you really need to do measurements that go deeper into the details than just what the WiiM Home app offers.
 
The sub can also relieve the main speakers (and amplifier) from excessive cone excursion (and power demands).
.. I'm sorry but in a well designed loudspeaker and amp there is no such thing; but still i do not allow myself to say that you belong to a school of myth 🙂
 
.. I'm sorry but in a well designed loudspeaker and amp there is no such thing; but still i do not allow myself to say that you belong to a school of myth 🙂
To continue this discussion and from an engineering point of view I fullhartedly disagree.

There is no speaker - no matter how well designed - that works the same, independent of woofer excursion. That's physics. You cannot change it.

Furthermore all speakers - no matter how well designed - work better when they don't have to cover the frequency range around their natural resonant frequency. No developer in his/her right mind would ever use a tweeter or midrange down to its resonant frequency for good reason. The woofer is the only speaker where this compromise is unfortunately unavoidable. Running both, the sub and the main speaker down to that point is not smart, to say the least.

Everything else is a myth. Uneducated high-end fairytales. Internet babble. BS.
 
To continue this discussion and from an engineering point of view I fullhartedly disagree.

There is no speaker - no matter how well designed - that works the same, independent of woofer excursion. That's physics. You cannot change it.

Furthermore all speakers - no matter how well designed - work better when they don't have to cover the frequency range around their natural resonant frequency. No developer in his/her right mind would ever use a tweeter or midrange down to its resonant frequency for good reason. The woofer is the only speaker where this compromise is unfortunately unavoidable. Running both, the sub and the main speaker down to that point is not smart, to say the least.

Everything else is a myth. Uneducated high-end fairytales. Internet babble. BS.
Ok as you wish, no problem 🙂
 
Right, B&K again, but moved 1m back and bumped the amp from 60% to 80% volume.

Had earplugs in haha, that sharp sound would destroy my ears

Crossover 75hz, 0db gain on the sub
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0595.jpeg
    IMG_0595.jpeg
    37.4 KB · Views: 7
Right, B&K again, but moved 1m back and bumped the amp from 60% to 80% volume.

Had earplugs in haha, that sharp sound would destroy my ears

Crossover 75hz, 0db gain on the sub
The previous run did look better to me.

Cannot judge what you are hearing, of course.
 
Back
Top