Brutal RMA Experience in Canada

aegli214

New member
Joined
Oct 9, 2025
Messages
1
Hi,

I wanted to share my horrible experience trying to RMA a broken Wiim Amp Pro in Canada for two reasons. First, is so others can hopefully have an easier time. Second, is so Wiim can reevaluate their process, because this has 100% stopped my plans to outfit my house with Wiim amps.

I bought a Wiim Amp Pro from Bestbuy.ca and around 60 days later, it started making a horrible buzzing noise from the Subwoofer Out. I filed a ticket and they agreed that it was broken and should be RMA'd. Annoying, but these things happen. Here is where the problems began. They said I would have to deal with Bestbuy, instead of them, which is highly unusual past the 30 day point.

I called Bestbuy, and they were very confused by this. They told me to go back to Wiim. Wiim said go back to Bestbuy. After a couple of calls, Bestbuy told me to drive to a Bestbuy 1 hour away, where it could be sent in. I arrived there, and they told me this wasn't true, and to call a special bestbuy number (2 hours of gas + >3 hours wasted at this point).

After calling the special Bestbuy number, I was told to call a company called Gentech. I called them and the person there was confused about this and was unfamiliar with Wiim, and it took about 5 days of calls to finally get an answer what to do. They said I should instead call a company called Microland:

Here is their number: (905) 940-1982

They were also somewhat confused by this, but eventually said to file an RMA. Their RMA forum was broken and kept trying to charge me $75.00 for an "out of warranty" repair. Eventually, after more emails, someone over rode this and created the RMA for me. I then had to ship the amp at my own expense to Microland. At this point I'm at about 8 hours of time and $100.00 of gas + shipping costs into this process.

They acknowledge receipt on December 18th, but tell me it's out of warranty and to please reply to email with my proof of purchase. I do this and they never respond again. I call three times and finally get through to someone today who says they need to wait another 1.5 weeks for a new board to come for the amp. They also say, it's out of warranty and to provide the proof of purchase again 😡

It's now been almost 1 month since Microland received the amp and 3 months since I started this process and I still have nothing. I'm fairly confident it would have been a better move time/money wise to throw the amp in the garbage and spend this time working a 2nd job to buying something new, which is perhaps the point of making this so difficult.

Wiim, you really need to reevaluate this process in Canada. It's beyond broken.

For anyone else about to undergo this unfortunate process, after verifying with Wiim the amp needs to be warrantied, directly call the microland number above to skip about 6 weeks of screwing around.

I'll try and update when I finally (hopefully) get a working amp back.
 
jez thats not good at all .. i feel your pain. Surely 'wiim' have their own process for at least the first year .. chk link below 1 year wiim warranty


I would inform wiim officially via ticket and email and get them involved. After all its their reputation thats affected.
 
Last edited:
A praise to European commercial legislation. The company / person you bought something from is your contractual partner and responsible for all and any customer claims for at least 6 months. No discussion.
How does an EU regulation apply to a purchase in Canada from a US company???
 
A praise to European commercial legislation. The company / person you bought something from is your contractual partner and responsible for all and any customer claims for at least 6 months. No discussion.
6 months? it's more:

 
I’m missing the point of this post - is it saying that in Canada, after 30 days if a fault develops with a device, the supplier can wash their hands of the issue and you need to take up the case with the manufacturer?
 
I'm not sure that you understood Aquaman's post.
OK. Please explain how this relates to a sale in Canada of an product made by an American company. The discussion of the situation in the EU is perhaps interesting but I still do not see the relevance to this situation unless the assumption is that the same rules are true in Canada.
 
OK. Please explain how this relates to a sale in Canada of an product made by an American company. The discussion of the situation in the EU is perhaps interesting but I still do not see the relevance to this situation unless the assumption is that the same rules are true in Canada.
Sorry to have caused irritations. In fact my post doesn‘t help you one bit.
It was more a conversational remark.
Good luck with your case!
 
OK. Please explain how this relates to a sale in Canada of an product made by an American company. The discussion of the situation in the EU is perhaps interesting but I still do not see the relevance to this situation unless the assumption is that the same rules are true in Canada.
Just shows that Canadian consumers would be better off if Canada joined the EU. All they need to do is become part of St Pierre et Miquelon, and hey presto! EU directives, citizenship, freedom of movement & the Euro apply. Three year warranties. French TV & Radio France. Bingo! 🇫🇷
 
Sorry to have caused irritations. In fact my post doesn‘t help you one bit.
It was more a conversational remark.
Good luck with your case!
I am not the OP so it is not my case.

I am not irritated, I just truly did not understand the comment. It seemed like you were trying to link the EU and Canada situations.

Sorry for the confusion.
 
Just shows that Canadian consumers would be better off if Canada joined the EU. All they need to do is become part of St Pierre et Miquelon, and hey presto! EU directives, citizenship, freedom of movement & the Euro apply. Three year warranties. French TV & Radio France. Bingo! 🇫🇷
But then they‘d all have to speak French🫣.
I remember visiting one our companies a couple of hours outside of Montreal. I felt like a total stranger not speaking any or just rudimentary French. One night in a bar I was talking to a real Frechman who also seemed to be a buddy of the barman. The Frenchman told me that he‘d been trying to teach the barnan to speak comprehensible French for years - completely in vain😂.
 
Last edited:
Just shows that Canadian consumers would be better off if Canada joined the EU. All they need to do is become part of St Pierre et Miquelon, and hey presto! EU directives, citizenship, freedom of movement & the Euro apply. Three year warranties. French TV & Radio France. Bingo! 🇫🇷
It would be better than being the 51st American state in any case
 
But then they‘d all have to speak French🫣.
I remember visiting one our companies a couple of hours outside of Montreal. I felt like a total stranger not speaking any or just rudimentary French. One night in a bar I was talking to a real Frechman who also seemed to be a buddy of the barman. The Frenchman told me that he‘d been trying to teach the barnan to speak comprehensible French for years - completely in vain😂.
Montreal is the Canadian metropolis, and it's the city where English is most widely spoken in Quebec. Visit the rest of Quebec (it's vast) and you'll hear French spoken, perhaps with an accent that people from France have difficulty understanding, but for Quebecers, it's the French from France who have expressions that are difficult to grasp... (Du coup) 😉
 
OK. Please explain how this relates to a sale in Canada of an product made by an American company. The discussion of the situation in the EU is perhaps interesting but I still do not see the relevance to this situation unless the assumption is that the same rules are true in Canada.

I still don't think that you fully understand the purpose of Aquaman's post, but I see no point in flogging a dead horse.
 
I still don't think that you fully understand the purpose of Aquaman's post, but I see no point in flogging a dead horse.
I clarified my thinking. He clarified his position. So lets move on.
 
Last edited:
It would be better than being the 51st American state in any case
Err - probably 52nd after The Freezin' State of Greenland will be 51st. A boat bumping into land 500 years ago doesn't count as sovereignty according to The Man - so Leif Erickson's landfall in N America 1000 years ago was a wasted effort also. Those pesky Viking immigrants got everywhere 😁
 
Back
Top