I didn’t know thatNot exactly.The advantage of a balanced connection is that the signal is fed to the receiver through two hot wires instead of one. There is the signal in its original form on one hot wire and then in its inverted form on the other hot wire. This leaves a third pin for a cable shield, which only serves this one purpose (shielding) and doesn't carry any signal. An interfering signal still picked up be the cable connection will be "common" to both hot wires. The differential input amplifier on the receiving end suppresses any signal identically present on both hot wires and amplifies the differential portion only. That's about it.
You can have 2.5 or even 4 V of output voltage using RCA connections, of course. It's just relatively uncommon.
I’d rather have a Toyota than a Lexus with the extra money in my pocketAs I said—I agree with you with regards to cost and mid-tier products.
But I will disagree with you regarding the follow-up to the Ultra, since we’re talking about a flagship product, and there are objective benefits/improvements (not to mention functional ones) to having true differential outputs. This isn’t a snake-oil/subjective matter.
No reason to place Toyota Corolla limitations on a Lexus LS.
-Ed
You’re not looking for a flagship. We can always talk about a next-gen Pro/Pro Plus in another thread. That’s not relevant.I’d rather have a Toyota than a Lexus with the extra money in my pocket![]()
I actually really like the ultra headphone jack. Amazingly the sound quality is better than my Marantz stereo amp. Also I was shocked at the sound quality I gained using it attached to my TV. I heard things whilst watching wheel of time again that I never heard on stereo 70. On the streaming side my Marantz and eversolo dmp-a6 run rings round it sound wise. Bass management of the WiiM ultra I just can’t get right.I like my Wiim Ultra but would love to see the following in an updated version:
- A DAC chip one step up, like in the Amp Ultra
- XLR balanced out
- 4 or 5 inch screen
- Better pop and noise reduction via HDMI and Optical In
- No need for Phono In or Headphone Out
- All the other I/O ports can stay the same
This would be my dream DAC/media streamer and preamp.
What would you like in an altered version 2?
Exactly.Not exactly.The advantage of a balanced connection is that the signal is fed to the receiver through two hot wires instead of one. There is the signal in its original form on one hot wire and then in its inverted form on the other hot wire. This leaves a third pin for a cable shield, which only serves this one purpose (shielding) and doesn't carry any signal. An interfering signal still picked up be the cable connection will be "common" to both hot wires. The differential input amplifier on the receiving end suppresses any signal identically present on both hot wires and amplifies the differential portion only. That's about it.
You can have 2.5 or even 4 V of output voltage using RCA connections, of course. It's just relatively uncommon.
A flagship for a Toyota is quite different from a Mercedes flagship.You’re not looking for a flagship. We can always talk about a next-gen Pro/Pro Plus in another thread. That’s not relevant.
-Ed
I would also like the screen and unit to be 1 inch taller as well, and this increased size would certainly allow for many more unnecessary inputs and outputs on the rear panel.For the WiiM Ultra Plus I would also like to see the screen extended to the full width. No need for the volume knob for me.
For me the ultimate Ultra (Plus) would be without any analog parts and full focus on the digital handling and services. That means better CPUs, more memory, multiple digital in/out (coax, optical, usb) but no DAC or ADC.
Then if WiiM would make highend active speakers (floor standing and sub) with LinkPlay module and top-end DACs, that would be the optimal setup. Else there are many good active speakers with digital input that can be used. I really prefer active speakers with unit optimized DSP and amplifier, to standalone amplifiers and passive speakers. Let us have digital signal all the way. No need for any kind of "smart" cables.
For the WiiM Ultra Plus I would also like to see the screen extended to the full width. No need for the volume knob for me.
you can bring the same "care" to the digital processing while keeping a dac, like a "plus plus" "plus mk2", which does not cost much to produce..and thus maintain a wider market than a "just digital"...For me the ultimate Ultra (Plus) would be without any analog parts and full focus on the digital handling and services. That means better CPUs, more memory, multiple digital in/out (coax, optical, usb) but no DAC or ADC.
Then if WiiM would make highend active speakers (floor standing and sub) with LinkPlay module and top-end DACs, that would be the optimal setup. Else there are many good active speakers with digital input that can be used. I really prefer active speakers with unit optimized DSP and amplifier, to standalone amplifiers and passive speakers. Let us have digital signal all the way. No need for any kind of "smart" cables.
For the WiiM Ultra Plus I would also like to see the screen extended to the full width. No need for the volume knob for me.
It was to utilize the power and space in the device to have more memory and better CPU processing, like two sets of CPUs, one for sound processing and one for services.you can bring the same "care" to the digital processing while keeping a dac, like a "plus plus" "plus mk2", which does not cost much to produce..and thus maintain a wider market than a "just digital"...
(Don't exaggerate...for example, someone willing to use a nice external DAC more than an internal one...the "extra cost" of the correct internal DAC is not such an obvious problem...)
look at the space available in a plus an ultra etc..and your chip treatments etc in cms...It was to utilize the power and space in the device to have more memory and better CPU processing, like two sets of CPUs, one for sound processing and one for services.
As you say, probably not a big enough market for that. People (and companies) is still stuck at the old HiFi set-up format with amplifiers and passive speakers.
‘Stuck’ is kinda harsh, don’t you think? Anyway, there’s a good reason for that. Active speakers with full DAC might serve a purpose for some folks, but definitely not all. Lots of limitations and constraints when you go down that road.It was to utilize the power and space in the device to have more memory and better CPU processing, like two sets of CPUs, one for sound processing and one for services.
As you say, probably not a big enough market for that. People (and companies) is still stuck at the old HiFi set-up format with amplifiers and passive speakers.
I say 'stuck' because it could be different if people want it. I see a lot of benefits in having the DAC and Amps as part of the speaker itself. Allowing the set to be fine tuned to the sound the manufacturer wants.‘Stuck’ is kinda harsh, don’t you think? Anyway, there’s a good reason for that. Active speakers with full DAC might serve a purpose for some folks, but definitely not all. Lots of limitations and constraints when you go down that road.
Unfortunately, that limits your options over time. I have had 3 DACs and 2 preamps in my system with the same speakers. With separates, I can fine tune the sound rather than getting just what the manufacturer wants.I say 'stuck' because it could be different if people want it. I see a lot of benefits in having the DAC and Amps as part of the speaker itself. Allowing the set to be fine tuned to the sound the manufacturer wants.