..... new amp for ultra

Worth noting that this is pretty much the same amplifier in a different enclosure, for quite a bit less money :)

I know this one but I want to have a similar design. Maybe the IOM Ncore if not available (100€ cheaper)
 
Hi Edd Nog
You didn’t post your review / findings with IOM ultra, any comment ?
Part I:
Part II:
I actually will be switching back to this amp soon; I am trading my pair of Topping B200s to my dad and taking the IOM Ultra back from him. My chain has about -6dB Gain loss due to DIRAC Live correction. At only +22dB gain on High Gain, the B200s are just a little short of gain that I desire for playing some of my quietest tracks at reference level, and the IOM Ultra's +26dB gain will resolve this problem handsomely. Temporarily using a VibeLink since I've shipped off the B200s to dad already. The VibeLink only has +20dB gain and is WAY too quiet because of this on my quietest tracks, and I'd rather not have to rely on a preamp between the DAC and the power amp to add gain.

-Ed
 
Probably been covered before no doubt.
WiiM Vibelink vs IOM Ultra, which one to go for, if either.
Am new to this Class D malarkey.
Currently using Quad 405/2 ( refurbed by Quad in March )
 
Probably been covered before no doubt.
WiiM Vibelink vs IOM Ultra, which one to go for, if either.
Am new to this Class D malarkey.
Currently using Quad 405/2 ( refurbed by Quad in March )
The VibeLink costs less, is slightly better visual match to WiiM Ultra streamer when stacked vertically, quieter pop noises when powering up. It also offers an analog volume attenuator (but no remote control).

IOM Ultra has more power, has more gain (provides greater headroom if room correction is applied that, "consumes," gain). It can take balanced, differential input from an external DAC if you pay for that upgrade. IOM is the same height as WiiM Ultra if placed side-by-side, unlike VibeLink, which is less tall.

Both are audibly transparent when level matched, flat across the audible frequency spectrum, and run very cool.

-Ed
 
Yeah, I'm sure the relative merits of both have been covered here and elsewhere.

My gut feeling is that, like many things in this crazy hobby, it depends - on your room, speakers, how hard you like to drive them, preferences, ears and brain etc. I personally don't think it's always necessary to go into the minutiae and chase every last db/ ounce of gain as @EddNog can appear to do, better to try and get your hands on the equipment and try it out. I feel some jumped at the IOM because it came to market before the Vibelink, perhaps was more of a visual match to the Ultra, and for those who like that sort of thing, it has the fashionable buzzwords like "Hypex Ncore driven amplifier" etc.

I think my vibelink is a good match for my Ultra and my Linn M109 speakers in my small to medium sized room and moderate listening levels (i.e. nobody asks me to turn the volume down - or up for that matter ;) )

YMMV...
 
The VibeLink costs less, is slightly better visual match to WiiM Ultra streamer when stacked vertically, quieter pop noises when powering up. It also offers an analog volume attenuator (but no remote control).

IOM Ultra has more power, has more gain (provides greater headroom if room correction is applied that, "consumes," gain). It can take balanced, differential input from an external DAC if you pay for that upgrade. IOM is the same height as WiiM Ultra if placed side-by-side, unlike VibeLink, which is less tall.

Both are audibly transparent when level matched, flat across the audible frequency spectrum, and run very cool.

-Ed
Hi Ed
Thanks for reply.
Thinking I might just spend the £250 on upgrading the Quad, dual power supplies, upgraded Caps etc etc.
Murf
 
Yeah, I'm sure the relative merits of both have been covered here and elsewhere.

My gut feeling is that, like many things in this crazy hobby, it depends - on your room, speakers, how hard you like to drive them, preferences, ears and brain etc. I personally don't think it's always necessary to go into the minutiae and chase every last db/ ounce of gain as @EddNog can appear to do, better to try and get your hands on the equipment and try it out. I feel some jumped at the IOM because it came to market before the Vibelink, perhaps was more of a visual match to the Ultra, and for those who like that sort of thing, it has the fashionable buzzwords like "Hypex Ncore driven amplifier" etc.

I think my vibelink is a good match for my Ultra and my Linn M109 speakers in my small to medium sized room and moderate listening levels (i.e. nobody asks me to turn the volume down - or up for that matter ;) )

YMMV...
Hi B
Thanks for input, what you are saying makes sense.
Murf
 
Back
Top