BK308
Senior Member
Sounds like you got it all figured out just don’t use the sub volume on the new remote lol
I like that we're already using the new remote! Now all I have to do is pinch myself and wake up.Sounds like you got it all figured out just don’t use the sub volume on the new remote lol
No let’s keep it going lol people want a new remote control. It’s not a ridiculous suggestion.I like that we're already using the new remote! Now all I have to do is pinch myself and wake up.
I don't mind. Since the new remote control will have two signal transmission channels, Bluetooth and IR, it is theoretically possible to implement adjustments on both the external amplifier and the Wiim simultaneously with a couple of buttons, but I am not sure that such a solution is accurate enough.No let’s keep it going lol people want a new remote control. It’s not a ridiculous suggestion.
Not sure I understand your linking balanced connections to room EQ, has nothing to do with my request, very odd … the fact of the matter is I need balanced connections for new active speakers and without this capability I will not purchase the Wiim and will rather go with a competitor. It’s not complicated and your “psychoanalysis” of my request is just silly.
Thanks, but it's not necessary at all. I have floor-standing speakers and a powerful amplifier, the bass is more than enough. In addition, I have a Pro Plus without connecting a subwoofer. In any case, separate adjustment is not very convenient?
I’d take this even further and call it the SuperUltraPro…A Superultra!
Basic Ultra functionality but with:
SE and Bal line inputs.
Analog phono stage(s). Steal the Cambridge Audio Alva Duo topology…
Even better ADC performance.
Stereo sub output (SE and Bal) for better bass room integration (two PEQ sets)
SE and Bal output.
Full HDMI functionality.
43 cm wide cabinet (this thing will need a large rear panel).
(The Ultra is the modern Yamaha WXC-50. The Superultra would be the modern Slimdevices Transporter.)
I thought I would get a big bass boost from putting my sub in a corner but I didn't. Maybe it depends on the type of walls you have.Well, whilst that works for you, it's oversimplistic as a guide for everyone.
Which floorstanders do you have? Some don't go a lot below a decent paid of standmounts, if at all, and most go nowhere near as low as a subwoofer.
In addition, floorstanders may be too big, or the user simply may not like the look of them. Floorstanders often don't work in a nearfield set up.
I have a pair of Wharfedale Diamond 12.1s, which have an F3 of c.60Hz, and an F10 of c.45Hz, which is pretty low - my sub takes me down to 17Hz at -6dB, and is probably +/-0dB at 35Hz (very few pop/rock recordings go below this anyway).
Regarding room correction and set up, it's the tiniest bit more of an effort with a sub, but nothing to worry about. For me the secret is simply to put the sub in a corner, get mad bass, and tame it. That's better than a more central position, and getting bass nulls that you just can't EQ out. By the way, this is another issue with floorstanders. The LF part of the frequency spectrum is tied to the positioning of your main speakers, and can't be moved. As we all know, with a subwoofer, initial placement (and experimentation with that) is the key to getting the sound right. You just don't have that level of flexibility with floorstanders; if you get your speakers placement right for the majority of the frequency range, then find you have bass nulls, you're pretty much shafted.
Horses for courses.
We are talking about a combined remote control with 2 types of signal transmission, like the existing Bluetooth remote control with the ability to reassign buttons to the IR channel and the ability to learn from old remote controls so that these buttons can control any device, for example, the volume of amplifier.Would an IR remote work with the existing units? Or are people just asking for something going forward? Just speaking personally, I'm not sure what the point is of an IR remote compared to the existing wi-fi one.
This is not the topic for this discussion, but I will be brief. I have inexpensive Polk audio S50e, with a phase inverter directed to the floor. Since I do not listen very loudly, it is enough for me, and I do not like the sound of the subwoofer. Of course, others can build systems as they like, I did not impose an opinion, but responded to a colleague's post.Well, whilst that works for you, it's oversimplistic as a guide for everyone.
Which floorstanders do you have? Some don't go a lot below a decent paid of standmounts, if at all, and most go nowhere near as low as a subwoofer.
In addition, floorstanders may be too big, or the user simply may not like the look of them. Floorstanders often don't work in a nearfield set up.
I have a pair of Wharfedale Diamond 12.1s, which have an F3 of c.60Hz, and an F10 of c.45Hz, which is pretty low - my sub takes me down to 17Hz at -6dB, and is probably +/-0dB at 35Hz (very few pop/rock recordings go below this anyway).
Regarding room correction and set up, it's the tiniest bit more of an effort with a sub, but nothing to worry about. For me the secret is simply to put the sub in a corner, get mad bass, and tame it. That's better than a more central position, and getting bass nulls that you just can't EQ out. By the way, this is another issue with floorstanders. The LF part of the frequency spectrum is tied to the positioning of your main speakers, and can't be moved. As we all know, with a subwoofer, initial placement (and experimentation with that) is the key to getting the sound right. You just don't have that level of flexibility with floorstanders; if you get your speakers placement right for the majority of the frequency range, then find you have bass nulls, you're pretty much shafted.
Horses for courses.
I thought I would get a big bass boost from putting my sub in a corner but I didn't. Maybe it depends on the type of walls you have.
This is not the topic for this discussion, but I will be brief. I have inexpensive Polk audio S50e, with a phase inverter directed to the floor. Since I do not listen very loudly, it is enough for me, and I do not like the sound of the subwoofer. Of course, others can build systems as they like, I did not impose an opinion, but responded to a colleague's post.
A Superultra!
Basic Ultra functionality but with:
SE and Bal line inputs.
Analog phono stage(s). Steal the Cambridge Audio Alva Duo topology…
Even better ADC performance.
Stereo sub output (SE and Bal) for better bass room integration (two PEQ sets)
SE and Bal output.
Full HDMI functionality.
43 cm wide cabinet (this thing will need a large rear panel).
(The Ultra is the modern Yamaha WXC-50. The Superultra would be the modern Slimdevices Transporter.)
I second this 100%. RC is a very serious business and add immense value to a product. Why not making it smoother by giving the option of using a mic without having to rely on a phone? There are hundredss of different models of Android phones around, and the chances to get a proper RC are very slim.when I had the DSpeaker antimode 2 it was very convenient to have its own microphone to connect to the front panel to take measurements. Well, I would like Wiim to have its own microphone to connect to the USB port.
It's the UltraMAX for the XLR connectorsYes. Add that functionality to my Superultra.
The Superultra must be 43 cm wide and have XLR connectors, not TRS. It’s an audiophile product you know.