WiiM Home App v3.0.5 Update - Dec 11, 2024

has practically no interest, (see if used also in the display of the peq mode rather inconvenients, this one being already not is not correct or sufficiently precise in the state)
wasted time for everyone...
It uses the smoothed measurements to generate the PEQ filters so it will make a difference.
 
has practically no interest, (see if used also in the display of the peq mode rather inconvenients, this one being already not is not correct or sufficiently precise in the state)
wasted time for everyone...
How about you try yourself instead bashing it off? Wiim did not spend their time if it’s waste of time for everyone.
 
It uses the smoothed measurements to generate the PEQ filters so it will make a difference.
Hey friend! So you’re right 1/3 is the smoothest of the graph and 1/12 has many tiny ripples. Which one sound best? It’s personal taste and there’s no right or wrong answer.
 
It’s presentation of measurements.
......
I was reacting to that....
when is it really?
such very strong smoothing would have little meaning before the correction calculations it seems to me... so that wiim clarifies the subject would be welcome
 
Last edited:
No smoothing at all is useless. Room Equalisation Wizard has an option with more smoothing at high frequencies and less at low frequencies which is a good compromise. 1/3 octave smoothing has more smoothing effect than 1/12 octave.
Hi @slartibartfast
Thanks to you and to @Bismarck I learnt new things. As I am far from being an expert in RC, indeed this is the first time I have tried this EQ, I was not familiar with Smoothing and its effects. It is never too late. ;) Thx :giggle:
 
Hi @slartibartfast
Thanks to you and to @Bismarck I learnt new things. As I am far from being an expert in RC, indeed this is the first time I have tried this EQ, I was not familiar with Smoothing and its effects. It is never too late. ;) Thx :giggle:
there is confusion about the use of smoothing...and its interest or not in the rc approach or...just display....
;-)
 
Are you quite sure about that, @slartibartfast? I cannot get my head around it. Regrettably I cannot do any tests myself now, only refer to REW measurements where smoothing is applied for display.
 
Are you quite sure about that, @slartibartfast? I cannot get my head around it. Regrettably I cannot do any tests myself now, only refer to REW measurements where smoothing is applied for display.
You should be able to see it in the curves produced during the room correction process. Android doesn't have the smoothing choice yet so I can't try myself. If it isn't using the smoothed curve for correction what else can it use?
With REW you still need to generate room correction filters from the frequency response. You do that by choosing the amount of smoothing before trying to match the target curve.
 
@Smartplug That is to be expected in a 1/3 vs 1/12 dB/oct smoothed display.
Do you have to do a new measurement to show 1/12 dB/oct?
@slartibartfast I am not able to do any tests this week (and my measuring tool is an iPhone12Mini).
@RyanWithWiim I think an official measurements «manual» could be helpful. What you have is way past the playtoy stage, seriously.
 
Last edited:
That is to be expected in a 1/3 vs 1/12 dB/oct smoothed display.
Do you have to do a new measurement to show 1/12 dB/oct?
Yes individual measurements on each octave. I would suggest run each octave and save them with different name. From there, give a listening test and see which one sound better to you. Everyone is different.
 
@Smartplug That is to be expected in a 1/3 vs 1/12 dB/oct smoothed display.
Do you have to do a new measurement to show 1/12 dB/oct?
@slartibartfast I am not able to do any tests this week (and my measuring tool is an iPhone12Mini).
@RyanWithWiim I think an official measurements «manual» could be helpful. What you have is way past the playtoy stage, seriously.
On rc setting, there is this drop down that you choose and from there you run rc like the way you run before. Each choice need to run rc.
 
Back
Top