WiiM Home App v3.2.2 Update – May 23, 2025

Please review the app update release notes below. If you encounter any issues, feel free to reach out to us.

App Release Version
v3.2.2

What's New:

1. Center Channel for Dolby 5.1 Setup: Assign a device as the Center Speaker (requires upcoming beta firmware update).
2. Improved Qobuz Browsing: A redesigned layout that enhances navigation, bringing it closer to the native Qobuz app experience.
3. Thumb Up/Down for Pandora: Support for thumbs up and thumbs down functionality on Pandora (requires upcoming firmware update).
4. NAS Indexing:
- Support for Minim Media Server indexing to enhance browsing.
- Folder category browsing for Windows Media Player Share in "Advanced Mode."
5. Local Music Improvements:
- Organize music by Composers and Genres for easier browsing.
- Enhanced Genre page layout, organizing tracks, albums, and artists all in one view.
- Add "Date Added" sorting option for tracks.
6. HotMix Update:
- Add "Rap US" and "Rap Francais" radio stations.
- Support for adding to Presets (requires upcoming firmware update).
7. [Android] Track Title Display: Show full track titles for KKBox, NAS, USB, Samba, Local Music, and Qobuz.
8. [Android] MMM for Stereo Room Correction (Beta): Support for Moving Microphone Measurement in Stereo Room Correction. Enable this feature in Room Correction settings. The Moving Microphone Measurement (MMM) for Left/Right Room Correction is coming soon. Stay tuned!
9. Input Rename: Option to restore default input names.
10. Lock Screen Controls for Various Inputs: Support for controlling playback directly from the Lock Screen, except for Bluetooth input.

Bug Fixes:

1. USB Media Library Fix: Fixed incorrect album artist names (requires upcoming firmware update).
2. [Android] Playback Failure Fix: Resolve playback issues caused by special characters.
3. General Enhancements: Improved overall stability, performance, and bug fixes.
 
Last edited:
I guess it is simply the design of this multi branded remotes.
It puts the device into standby mode immediately and - let's not split hairs here - that's probably exactly what @Lomax_hjs has been asking for, just as a function of the app.

If they didn't and really asked for a power down routine, they may speak for themselves.
 
Yes, in low frequencies the two methods will give quite similar, but not 100% identical measurement results. The difference can be larger or smaller, depending on how big of an area you cover when doing MMM.

Here's a comparison of both methods in my system (after EQ):
View attachment 21877

As you can see, the differences in the low frequencies (<400H, i.e. where I do room EQ) are mostly in the 1-2dB range. There's more difference at higher frequencies, where MMM averages-out the (audibly benign) comb filtering caused by reflections.


As you can see above, the bass range correction results translate reasonably well between the two methods, so it is fine to use either method in principle.
However, evaluating MMM correction results with MMM would give a better match to the "predicted" curve shown earlier when the filters are calculated.
Personally I prefer to use the same measurement method when building correction filters and evaluating the results.
Perhaps I should clarify a bit - the two measurements I show in the quoted post were done when using the exact same set of EQ correction filters, just that one result measurement/evaluation attempt was with a sweep measurement in REW and the other with MMM.

So this just shows that both MMM and sweep are comparable for RC result evaluation.

On the other hand, @slartibartfast apparently used MMM both times in REW to evaluate results of WHA RC filters calculated with a single sweep, compared to those calculated with MMM.
This indicates that the room correction result varies a bit depending on the measurement method chosen (which is my experience as well, and why I typically prefer MMM).

@slartibartfast Do you get the same kind of differences with multiple RC attempts of either type? I'd expect MMM to be relatively stable between takes, but single point sweep not neccesarily as much.
 
It puts the device into standby mode immediately and - let's not split hairs here - that's probably exactly what @Lomax_hjs has been asking for, just as a function of the app.

If they didn't and really asked for a power down routine, they may speak for themselves.
The last what I wanted was to blame the infallible WiiM. But these remotes look one as the other..
 
However, evaluating MMM correction results with MMM would give a better match to the "predicted" curve shown earlier when the filters are calculated.
Personally I prefer to use the same measurement method when building correction filters and evaluating the results.
We do know that WiiM currently perform the swept sine measurement in the MLP and the MMM measurement. What we do not know is how they are using both measurements to come up with the correction filters.

Different weighting? Maybe depending on frequency range? Possibly even depending on the current RC settings? Could be I'm overthinking this and they are just averaging both results, but we don't know for sure.
 
The last what I wanted was to blame the infallible WiiM. But these remotes look one as the other..
I didn't assume you were blaming anybody. I just wanted to make clear (for those who don't have the physical remote) that the button actually does something. It's not like an appendix WiiM couldn't get rid of. ;)
 
Perhaps I should clarify a bit - the two measurements I show in the quoted post were done when using the exact same set of EQ correction filters, just that one result measurement/evaluation attempt was with a sweep measurement in REW and the other with MMM.

So this just shows that both MMM and sweep are comparable for RC result evaluation.

On the other hand, @slartibartfast apparently used MMM both times in REW to evaluate results of WHA RC filters calculated with a single sweep, compared to those calculated with MMM.
This indicates that the room correction result varies a bit depending on the measurement method chosen (which is my experience as well, and why I typically prefer MMM).

@slartibartfast Do you get the same kind of differences with multiple RC attempts of either type? I'd expect MMM to be relatively stable between takes, but single point sweep not neccesarily as much.
MMM is very repeatable. You can see the RTA stabilising while performing the measurement.
I think if I left the mic in exactly the same location multiple sweeps would also be repeatable, I always got very similar results when trying the multiple measurement option compared to a single sweep.
With regard to your similar measurements when comparing sweep to MMM in REW it makes you wonder why WiiM feel the need to first perform a sweep followed by MMM.
 
Back
Top