Snake oil update! šŸ

ok, so now that the dust has settled a bit, thought i'd pop in with an update... please don't shoot me, it's not a snake oil update šŸ”« (one of those is coming very soon, and i promise to anyone who cares it's gonna be a good one! ;) )

more of just an expansion on stuff that keeps coming up in other threads but i don't wanna pollute them with my blasphemous ideas! :devilish:
to those that are clearly in one church OR other (most people on these forums seem to be measurementphiles šŸ‘€ ), please look away, go "enjoy the music" or whatever you need to do to keep calm before reading this! šŸ§˜ā€ā™‚ļø šŸ™ (mods please don't ban me and @ WiiM team - the offer to shut me up with free prototype mini v2 or ultra is still on the table)

anyways, been catching up on scientific audiophile's youtube content (will refer to him as S|A from now on - very balanced and quite funny) and he's pointing out an issue that comes up a lot. many people on here seem to completely disregard my point when i refer to the "limitations of measurements" (or how we apply them). :confused:


in his videos on the WiiM amp and the Fosi audio za3 + v3 - S|A points out important measurements that many reviewers almost never perform (erin's audio corner does some like the pink noise test on amps) and the ways that manufacturers can "game the system" (does anyone remember the VW fiasco?!! :ROFLMAO: ) by making sure that the products test well under "standard ideal testing conditions" that they know the popular reviewers are going to use. (check out his short video on the za3 if you want to see a great example)

for example many of these new amps can easily play a 1 KHz test tone at the rated SPL through the speakers as mentioned on the spec sheet, but when a complex signal is used like pink noise (or multitone tests, or actual music) then they are NOT able to meet the specs they claim. obviously this affects every manufacturer to some degree or another - but it's much more rampant in the lower end class D amps than it is in the old-school class A or class A/B ones for example. this is what andrew robinson meant when he says "the problem with measurements is that they tend to show you the best WORST-case scenario" (and sometimes only that) in his "head to head" video of the WiiM amp vs onkyo AVR from @D1N0 's interesting thread...

the reason i need to point this out is because issues such as this would probably be quite apparent if you listened to an amp like this closely enough in a practical and realistc listening environment! you would maybe notice the lack of dynamics at medium listening levels, and obviously the lack of volume when you try to crank it up... i mean shocking, right?! šŸ˜± you mean you actually need to listend to an audio reproduction device to evaluate it? haha!! šŸ™ƒ

(as a side note - i ā˜£ļø DO NOT ā˜£ļø recommend listening to music loud (>75dB) for periods longer than a few minutes at a time WITH BREAKS!! acoustic damage that causes hearing loss is real, people - and i don't hear enough people talking about this tbh ā˜ ļø. it's worth pointing out much of these specific issues highlighted here might not apply to playing music at "normal" listening levels <70dB)

but anyways maybe these ideas can demonstrate the value of combining both listening and measurements when evaluating equipment, and trying to improve the application of both. and just to remind people that they are NOT mutually exclusive! after all - scientific thinkers must have an open enough mind to discover something new, right? all of this applies to snake oil stuff as well, by the way.
This is very serious and wiim (and other class d manufacturers) should respond - the guy says that power specs are met only with 1khz and with other signals it cannot even reach 1 watt power rating when fed with 2.1v signal and channel separation -the test indicated that content from the right channel sounded in the left channel- and the load dependency that indicated that frequency response changes with varying loads. So yes... not good. He tested it with analogue inputs.
 
Last edited:
Could the channel separation issue be resolved in firmware?
 
It is possible to solve channel desperation issues by wearing different coloured socks.

I tried a blind test, but it failed, because I couldnā€™t even tell if Iā€™d managed to use socks of different colours.
 
On a tangential note, coloured socks remind me of being on an interview panel and the candidate being asked to describe something about himself that may not be immediately obvious to others. He said that he always wore odd coloured socks and then proceeded to take his shoes off and put his feet on the table to prove it. He didnā€™t get the jobā€¦šŸ¤£
 
Audioquest carbon optical . I received it today . First impression soundstage is wider and deeper, bass and treble clearer . Bass is more impactful. Micro details much more easily detectable and decay of bass notes .piano is cleaner with absence of smearing while being hefty with nice fast decay . Clean and smooth . In comparison Audioquest pearl although very good , it is overall more fuzzy and less focused than carbon . If you donā€™t try carbon ever , Audioquest pearl could seem all you need. I could live with pearl but carbon wins easily. If I could quantify the difference is 5-10% better. Also preferable to qed performance coaxial , more natural and clean
 
Last edited:
Why oh why...

I knowā€¦ Wiim test signal for 24/192 does not start with a crackle now . In specs officially 24/192 is not supported by the internal dac for optical . Now it plays smoothly. Maybe they are not frauds for releasing these higher end models . Maybe there is a reason other than pure scam ā€¦ Maybeā€¦
 
I knowā€¦ Wiim test signal for 24/192 does not start with a crackle now . In specs officially 24/192 is not supported by the internal dac for optical . Now it plays smoothly. Maybe they are not frauds for releasing these higher end models . Maybe there is a reason other than pure scam ā€¦ Maybeā€¦
wow, that's crazy - you noticed the same thing that i did!! the crackle sounds at the start of playback also went away when i switched to my glass ludic orpheus toslink cable.
i've got another snake oil update coming soon. but i'm just listening a bit more before i drop the full update. allowing things to burn in and all that jazz šŸ˜Ž some of the stuff is scandalous - @onlyoneme might have a heart attack ā˜ ļø
 
Last edited:
ok, so now that the dust has settled a bit, thought i'd pop in with an update... please don't shoot me, it's not a snake oil update šŸ”« (one of those is coming very soon, and i promise to anyone who cares it's gonna be a good one! ;) )

more of just an expansion on stuff that keeps coming up in other threads but i don't wanna pollute them with my blasphemous ideas! :devilish:
to those that are clearly in one church OR other (most people on these forums seem to be measurementphiles šŸ‘€ ), please look away, go "enjoy the music" or whatever you need to do to keep calm before reading this! šŸ§˜ā€ā™‚ļø šŸ™ (mods please don't ban me and @ WiiM team - the offer to shut me up with free prototype mini v2 or ultra is still on the table)

anyways, been catching up on scientific audiophile's youtube content (will refer to him as S|A from now on - very balanced and quite funny) and he's pointing out an issue that comes up a lot. many people on here seem to completely disregard my point when i refer to the "limitations of measurements" (or how we apply them). :confused:


in his videos on the WiiM amp and the Fosi audio za3 + v3 - S|A points out important measurements that many reviewers almost never perform (erin's audio corner does some like the pink noise test on amps) and the ways that manufacturers can "game the system" (does anyone remember the VW fiasco?!! :ROFLMAO: ) by making sure that the products test well under "standard ideal testing conditions" that they know the popular reviewers are going to use. (check out his short video on the za3 if you want to see a great example)

for example many of these new amps can easily play a 1 KHz test tone at the rated SPL through the speakers as mentioned on the spec sheet, but when a complex signal is used like pink noise (or multitone tests, or actual music) then they are NOT able to meet the specs they claim. obviously this affects every manufacturer to some degree or another - but it's much more rampant in the lower end class D amps than it is in the old-school class A or class A/B ones for example. this is what andrew robinson meant when he says "the problem with measurements is that they tend to show you the best WORST-case scenario" (and sometimes only that) in his "head to head" video of the WiiM amp vs onkyo AVR from @D1N0 's interesting thread...

the reason i need to point this out is because issues such as this would probably be quite apparent if you listened to an amp like this closely enough in a practical and realistc listening environment! you would maybe notice the lack of dynamics at medium listening levels, and obviously the lack of volume when you try to crank it up... i mean shocking, right?! šŸ˜± you mean you actually need to listend to an audio reproduction device to evaluate it? haha!! šŸ™ƒ

(as a side note - i ā˜£ļø DO NOT ā˜£ļø recommend listening to music loud (>75dB) for periods longer than a few minutes at a time WITH BREAKS!! acoustic damage that causes hearing loss is real, people - and i don't hear enough people talking about this tbh ā˜ ļø. it's worth pointing out much of these specific issues highlighted here might not apply to playing music at "normal" listening levels <70dB)

but anyways maybe these ideas can demonstrate the value of combining both listening and measurements when evaluating equipment, and trying to improve the application of both. and just to remind people that they are NOT mutually exclusive! after all - scientific thinkers must have an open enough mind to discover something new, right? all of this applies to snake oil stuff as well, by the way.
This reminds me of the argument about AVR measurements in the mid to late 2000's between discrete and integrated amplifier power measurements. As I remember Denon used to use discrete amplifier stages and would give their output as xxW RMS 'all channels driven' and Onkyo using integrated amp stage would give their output as yyW RMS 'one channel driven'. Yy was bigger than xx but obviously if the Onkyo had all channels drive it could not hit it's Yy value. Some people got very exercised about it.

The funny thing was that in your living room you would go deaf if you went anywhere near utilising that kind of power whatever the tech or measurement standard used. When they were little my kids made the mistake of turning up my Denon AVR 1911 to '0'. Frightened the life out of them šŸ˜‚

I think as long as similar tech uses the same standard and you know the limitations of that standard you have a way of comparing stuff.

It's also no secret that class D amps drop off a cliff from an overall performance wise at their highest power.
 
Thanks @Griff for the anecdote, this stuff might be common knowledge to some, but there are plenty of these "YouTube-review" consumers out there nowadays who buy stuff based almost SOLELY on the position of a product in ASR's SINAD (/THD+N) leaderboard or some other random measurements they have deemed the Holy grail... šŸ˜‚

I don't understand how people buy Hi-Fi stuff based purely on measurements and completely disregarding the listening part!! šŸ¤¦ā€ā™‚ļø It's like buying a car without a test drive just based on its 0-100 acceleration number. šŸ¤·ā€ā™‚ļø

None of this is new I guess - manufacturers have always bent the rules in their marketing, and there have always been groups people that claim that every measurement necessary already exists.. But with some people nowadays it's all they care about/want to discuss, and the complete lack of respect for experiences is what I think is extreme...

especially when they claim that this line of thinking is "scientific". Lmao. True scientists are always aware of the limitations of their methods, and are always curious to figure out more about the unknown with humility and open minds... šŸ¤”

Well, here's something to keep the thread interesting...

 
I don't understand how people buy Hi-Fi stuff based purely on measurements and completely disregarding the listening part!! šŸ¤¦ā€ā™‚ļø It's like buying a car without a test drive just based on its 0-100 acceleration number. šŸ¤·ā€ā™‚ļø
I suppose it can be quite difficult these days to get a hifi shop where you can listen before you buy. There is always buy and send back within 14 days or whatever, but thats a bit of effort. I have 3 hifi shops near me that you can listen to kit like Denon, NAD etc but none stock a Topping or SMSL amp etc.

The good news is that due to the success of WIIM they all stock WIIM devices now and will demo. Trouble is I don't think that is a common situation and so we are back to measurements, reviews and...... of course forum debates šŸ¤£
 
I don't understand how people buy Hi-Fi stuff based purely on measurements and completely disregarding the listening part!!

In relation to speakers, this is a strawman argument - Iā€™m not sure anyone does, or that anyone advocates doing so.

For electronics (DACs and amps) , if an item measures as transparent, thereā€™s absolutely no need to listen/audition. By definition, it canā€™t sound ā€˜wrongā€™ it even different to any other transparent product.

This has been demonstrated in double blind test after double blind test. Those disagreeing have been challenged to show they can hear a difference in a controlled test, and either failed to take up the offer, or have failed the test.

Iā€™ve never been to Poland, but if someone tells me the rain there is wet, I really donā€™t have to pop over to test it for myself.
 
Where are the properly conducted blinds test please? Any links ? They cost a lot of money to be done correctly
 
Where are the properly conducted blinds test please? Any links ? They cost a lot of money to be done correctly

Thereā€™s a list as long as your arm here:


Of course, hereā€™s the real point. The individual criteria and parameters have all had numerous fully academic tests, which have shown the absolutely of what level of noise, what % distortion, etc., are audible to humans. These are undisputed, and many have been around for years, and re-tested.

In a way, insisting a particular, individual DAC needs to be blind tested is a red herring. If we know the FR is flat, and noise inaudible (etc., etc.) then itā€™s impossible for it to sound different to any other DAC which also measures a pass in all the relevant areas.

If that theory is incorrect, it should be a piece of cake to disprove. As it hasnā€™t been, we can safely continue with that, until and unless proven otherwise. We donā€™t need to blind test every measurably transparent DAC against every other measurably transparent DAC.
 
I have 4 DACs in my house and they all sound different from each other. Maybe I have bionic ears :) . When it comes to sound I only trust my ears. The Schitt Bifrost that I bought didn't sound anything like my current R2R DAC. It sounded great but the sibilance became tiring after 30 min or so but it was very dynamic. YMMV.
 
Back
Top