WiiM Home App v2.10.0 Update - Jun 16, 2024

Surely the device would output the necessary sounds from the speakers separately, one sweep from the left, next from the right.
This is exactly how the different room correction systems work on AVRs and pre/pros, such as Dirac, Anthem's Genesis Arc, Audessey, and others as well.
They also have you take measurements from different locations adjacent to the main listening position.
 
This is exactly how the different room correction systems work on AVRs and pre/pros, such as Dirac, Anthem's Genesis Arc, Audessey, and others as well.
They also have you take measurements from different locations adjacent to the main listening position.
And how many Millions$$ do those companies spend on R&D - monies brought in by Licensing Fees. Do we really expect that level of sophistication for FREE??
 
And how many Millions$$ do those companies spend on R&D - monies brought in by Licensing Fees. Do we really expect that level of sophistication for FREE??
Well if you have used those systems,WiiM’s is not even close.
 
But still free ...

Now tell me that the extra expense is worth it in WiiM's price range ... ;)
 
But still free ...

Now tell me that the extra expense is worth it in WiiM's price range ... ;)

There’s also the question of necessity.

None of us will end up with an acoustically perfect room, whether that’s with physical treatment or EQ. So we’ll all end up ‘listening to the room’ to some extent. And we know that our brains account for this.

Obviously we want to be rid of any major nasties, but beyond that I’m not sure just how beneficial EQ-ing away that last 0.1dB at 15kHz actually is.
 
And how many Millions$$ do those companies spend on R&D - monies brought in by Licensing Fees. Do we really expect that level of sophistication for FREE??

The thing is, with the rise of AI, what was once a lengthy and hugely labour-intensive process, is soon to become very fast and very cheap.
 
There’s also the question of necessity.

None of us will end up with an acoustically perfect room, whether that’s with physical treatment or EQ. So we’ll all end up ‘listening to the room’ to some extent. And we know that our brains account for this.

Obviously we want to be rid of any major nasties, but beyond that I’m not sure just how beneficial EQ-ing away that last 0.1dB at 15kHz actually is.
If you decide you don't like the sound of your speakers you can also change that so it isn't just room correction 😀
 
There’s also the question of necessity.

None of us will end up with an acoustically perfect room, whether that’s with physical treatment or EQ. So we’ll all end up ‘listening to the room’ to some extent. And we know that our brains account for this.

Obviously we want to be rid of any major nasties, but beyond that I’m not sure just how beneficial EQ-ing away that last 0.1dB at 15kHz actually is.

Generally correction is best <400hz, subwoofer definietly improved (as is phase alignment) but for speakers generally find it's all over the place until 300/400hz and generally flat. As long as the speaker isn't badly designed, or you're in a bathroom.
 
Back
Top